Approach: Rebuild the possible routes directly from the allowed edges (S→A, S→B, A→C, B→C, A→E, B→F, C→D, E→D, F→D, the network implied by the four listed paths), then apply the two rules that can actually cut a route.
Step 1: Branch from S. Only two exits from S: to A or to B.
Step 2: Continue from A. From A, the route can go to C (giving S→A→C→D) or to E (giving S→A→E→D). Both are 3-edge routes, no repeats, both pass Rules 1 and 2.
Step 3: Continue from B. From B, the route can go to C (giving S→B→C→D) or to F (giving S→B→F→D).
Step 4: Apply Rule 3 (no C with E) and Rule 4 (no B with F). The two C-routes never meet E, so Rule 3 removes nothing; the E-route has no C either, so it survives Rule 3 too. But S→B→F→D uses both B and F together, Rule 4 removes exactly this one route.
Step 5: Count survivors. Of the 4 constructed routes, 1 is removed:
\[ 4 - 1 = 3 \]
Final Answer: 3 (option 1).