Question:

A conduct crime does not necessarily require

Show Hint

Think of it this way: - Conduct crime: The journey (the act) is the crime. (e.g., dangerous driving) - Result crime: The destination (the result) is the crime. (e.g., causing death by dangerous driving)
Updated On: Jul 7, 2026
  • mens rea
  • actus reus
  • consequence
  • none of the above
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks to identify which element is not a necessary component of a "conduct crime." This requires understanding the distinction between different types of crimes based on their ‘actus reus‘.

Step 2: Key Concepts and Approach:

Crimes can be broadly classified into two categories based on the nature of their ‘actus reus‘:

Conduct Crimes: These are offences where the ‘actus reus‘ is simply the prohibited conduct itself, irrespective of whether it leads to a harmful result. The crime is complete once the prohibited action is performed. Examples include rash and negligent driving (Section 279 IPC), perjury, or possession of illegal drugs.

Result (or Consequence) Crimes: These are offences where the ‘actus reus‘ requires not just the conduct, but also that the conduct must produce a specific prohibited result or consequence. For example, in murder, the conduct (e.g., stabbing) must result in the consequence of death.

Step 3: Detailed Explanation:


Analyzing the elements:
- (A) ‘mens rea‘: Most conduct crimes still require a guilty mind (e.g., rashness, negligence, or intention to possess).
- (B) ‘actus reus‘: By definition, every crime requires an ‘actus reus‘, which in this case is the prohibited conduct.
- (C) ‘consequence‘: The defining feature of a conduct crime is that it does *not* require a harmful consequence. The act of driving rashly is a crime, even if no accident or injury occurs. The crime lies in the conduct itself. Therefore, a consequence is not a necessary element.

Step 4: Final Answer:

A conduct crime is defined by the prohibited action itself, and therefore, it does not necessarily require a prohibited consequence or result to have occurred for the offence to be complete.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0