Given: \[ x(x + 3) < 0 \] Solve the inequality:
\[ -3 < x < 0 \] Now, can we conclude \( |x| < 3 \)? Yes, because:
BUT: We are told to assess if this statement **alone** is enough to **guarantee** \( |x| < 3 \) in general. Yes — in fact, from this alone we can conclude \( |x| < 3 \), since \( x \) is between \(-3\) and \(0\). (So this contradicts the original claim in your comment — see clarification below.)
Given: \[ x(x - 3) > 0 \] Solve the inequality:
This is a union of two disjoint intervals. On its own, this does **not** help us determine whether \( |x| < 3 \), because:
So Statement B **alone** is **not sufficient**.
Hence, both statements together are sufficient to conclude \( |x| < 3 \).
\[ \boxed{\text{Both statements are needed to conclude that } |x| < 3} \]
| P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | Fixed Payment | Bonus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arun | 4 | Rs. 1000 | Rs. 250 × Final Rating | ||||
| Barun | 3 | Rs. 1200 | Rs. 200 × Final Rating | ||||
| Chandan | 2 | Rs. 1400 | Rs. 100 × Final Rating | ||||
| Damodaran | 3 | Rs. 1300 | Rs. 150 × Final Rating | ||||
| Eman | 2 | Rs. 1100 | Rs. 200 × Final Rating |
| English | Hindi | Mathematics | Science | Social Science | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alva | 80 | 75 | 70 | 75 | 60 |
| Bithi | 90 | 80 | 55 | 85 | 85 |
| Carl | 75 | 80 | 90 | 100 | 90 |
| Deep | 70 | 90 | 100 | 90 | 80 |
| Esha | 80 | 85 | 95 | 60 | 55 |
| Foni | 83 | 72 | 78 | 88 | 83 |