Comprehension

While I was in class at Columbia, struggling with the esoterica du jour, my father was on a bricklayer’s scaffold not far up the street, working on a campus building. Once we met up on the subway going home — he was with his tools, I with my books. My father wasn’t interested in Thucydides, and I wasn’t up on arches. My dad has built lots of places in New York City he can’t get into: colleges, condos, office towers. He made his living on the outside. Once the walls were up, a place took on a different feel for him, as though he wasn’t welcome anymore. Related by blood, we’re separated by class, my father and I. Being the white-collar child of a blue-collar parent means being the hinge on the door between two ways of life. With one foot in the working-class, the other in the middle class, people like me are Straddlers, at home in neither world, living a limbo life.

What drove me to leave what I knew? Born blue-collar, I still never felt completely at home among the tough guys and anti-intellectual crowd of my neighbourhood in deepest Brooklyn. I never did completely fit in among the preppies and suburban royalty of Columbia, either. It’s like that for Straddlers. It was not so smooth jumping from Italian old-world style to US professional in a single generation. Others who were the first in their families to go to college, will tell you the same thing: the academy can render you unrecognisable to the very people who launched you into the world. The ideas and values absorbed in college challenge the mom-and pop orthodoxy that passed for truth for 18 years. Limbo folk may eschew polyester blends for sea-isle cotton, prefer Brie to Kraft slices. They marry outside the neighbourhood and raise their kids differently. They might not be in church on Sunday.

When they pick careers (not jobs), it’s often a kind of work their parents never heard of or can’t understand. But for the white-collar kids of blue-collar parents, the office is not necessarily a sanctuary. In Corporate America, where the rules are based on notions foreign to working-class people, a Straddler can get lost. Social class counts at the office, even though nobody likes to admit it. Ultimately, corporate norms are based on middle-class values, business types say. From an early age, middle-class people learn how to get along, using diplomacy, nuance, and politics to grab what they need. It is as though they are following a set of rules laid out in a manual that blue-collar families never have the chance to read.

People born into the middle class to parents with college degrees have lived lives filled with what French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu calls ‘cultural capital’. Growing up in an educated environment, they learn about Picasso and Mozart, stock portfolios and crème brulee. In a home with cultural capital, there are networks: someone always has an aunt or golfing buddy with the inside track for an internship or some entry-level job. Dinner-table talk could involve what happened that day to mom and dad at the law firm, the doctor’s office, or the executive suite. Middle-class kids can grow up with a sense of entitlement that will carry them through their lives. This ‘belongingness’ is not just related to having material means, it also has to do with learning and possessing confidence in your place in the world. Such early access and direct exposure to culture in the home is the more organic, ‘legitimate’ means of appropriating cultural capital, Bourdieu tells us. Those of us possessing ‘ill-gotten Culture’ can learn it, but never as well. Something is always a little off about us, like an engine with imprecise timing. There’s a greater match between middle-class lives and the institutions in which the middle class works and operates — universities or corporations. Children of the middle and upper classes have been speaking the language of the bosses and supervisors forever.

Blue-collar kids are taught by their parents and communities to work hard to achieve, and that merit is rewarded. But no blue-collar parent knows whether such things are true in the middle-class world. Many professionals born to the working-class report feeling out of place and out of place and outmanoeuvred in the office. Soon enough, Straddlers learn that straight talk won’t always cut. Resolving conflicts head-on and speaking your mind doesn’t always work, no matter how educated the Straddler is.

In the working-class, people perform jobs in which they are closely supervised and are required to follow orders and instructions. That, in turn, affects how they socialise their children. Children of the working-class are brought up in a home in which conformity, obedience and intolerance for back talk are the norm — the same characteristics that make a good factory worker.

Question: 1

According to the passage, which of the following statements about 'cultural capital' is NOT true?

Show Hint

Look for answers that focus on the nature and benefits of cultural capital, especially as it relates to class identity.
Updated On: Jun 30, 2026
  • It socializes children early into the norms of middle class institutions.
  • It helps them learn the language of universities and corporations.
  • It creates a sense of enlightenment in middle-class children.
  • It develops bright kids into Straddlers.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

The passage mentions that "Straddlers" are individuals caught between two worlds (working-class and middle-class), and that cultural capital is something that middle-class children inherit naturally. It doesn't suggest that cultural capital creates Straddlers. Therefore, the Correct Answer is: \[ \boxed{(4) \ \text{It develops bright kids into Straddlers.}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

According to the passage, the patterns of socialization of working-class children make them most suited for jobs that require

Show Hint

Focus on the types of jobs mentioned in the passage and how socialization patterns influence suitability for those roles.
Updated On: Jun 30, 2026
  • diplomacy.
  • compliance with orders.
  • enterprise and initiative.
  • high risk-taking.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

The passage mentions that working-class children are socialized into a world where they learn to follow rules, which makes them suited for jobs requiring compliance with orders. Therefore, the Correct Answer is: \[ \boxed{(2) \ \text{compliance with orders.}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

When Straddlers enter white collar jobs, they get lost because

Show Hint

Focus on how Straddlers’ backgrounds create a disconnect in corporate environments.
Updated On: Jun 30, 2026
  • they are thrown into an alien value system.
  • their families have not read the rules in corporate manuals.
  • they have no one to guide them through the corporate maze.
  • they miss the ‘mom and pop orthodoxy.’
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

The passage indicates that Straddlers often struggle in white-collar jobs because they are introduced to an alien value system that contrasts with the working-class norms they grew up with. Therefore, the Correct Answer is: \[ \boxed{(1) \ \text{they are thrown into an alien value system.}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

What does the author’s statement, “My father wasn’t interested in Thucydides, and I wasn’t up on arches,” illustrate?

Show Hint

The author goes on to say that they are "related by blood" but "separated by class". Think about what the gap between a bricklayer father and a Columbia student son shows.
Updated On: Nov 6, 2026
  • Evolving social transformation
  • Professional arrogance and social distance
  • Organic cultural capital
  • Breakdown of family relationships
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Read the statement in its place:
The author is a student at Columbia while his father lays bricks on a campus building. Neither knows the other’s world: the father is not interested in Thucydides and the son is not up on arches. Right after this the author says, "Related by blood, we’re separated by class."

Step 2: Decide what it illustrates:
The son has moved from a blue-collar background to a white-collar one in a single generation, so the two now live in different social worlds. This shows a changing social position across generations, that is, an evolving social transformation.

Step 3: Check the other options:
Option (3): "organic" cultural capital belongs to people raised in middle-class, educated homes; the author calls his own culture "ill-gotten", so this is not it. Option (2): there is no arrogance in the tone; the remark is wistful. Option (4): the author speaks of a class gap, not of a breakdown in the relationship.

Final Answer:
The correct option is (1): Evolving social transformation
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5

Which of the following statements about Straddlers does the passage NOT support explicitly?

Show Hint

Look for the passage lines on food, church attendance and belonging. The statement with no matching line is the answer.
Updated On: Nov 6, 2026
  • Their food preferences may not match those of their parents.
  • They may not keep up some central religious practices of their parents.
  • Their political ideologies may differ from those of their parents.
  • They are at home neither in the middle class nor in the working-class.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Option (1):
The passage says limbo folk "may eschew polyester blends for sea-isle cotton, prefer Brie to Kraft slices", so food preferences can differ. Supported.

Step 2: Option (2):
"They might not be in church on Sunday" supports this. Supported.

Step 3: Option (4):
"People like me are Straddlers, at home in neither world, living a limbo life." Supported.

Step 4: Option (3):
The passage speaks of ideas and values in general, but nowhere mentions political ideology. This is not supported explicitly.

Final Answer:
The correct option is (3): Their political ideologies may differ from those of their parents.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0