Step 1: Universal word orders.
In typology (Greenberg, Comrie, Dryer), six possible word orders exist: SVO, SOV, VSO, VOS, OVS, OSV. Among these, SVO and SOV dominate globally.
Step 2: Distribution.
- SOV (Subject–Object–Verb): found in Hindi, Japanese, Turkish. Estimated to cover \(\sim 45%\) of world's languages.
- SVO (Subject–Verb–Object): found in English, Mandarin, Swahili. Estimated to cover \(\sim 42%\) of world's languages.
Together, these two account for nearly 85–90% of world languages.
Step 3: Rule out other pairs.
- SOV–VSO: VSO is less common (e.g., Arabic, Celtic).
- VSO–VOS, SOV–VOS: both far rarer combinations.
\[
\boxed{\text{Correct Answer: (A) SVO–SOV}}
\]
Consider the following two statements, S1 and S2 and choose the correct option.
S1: If X is an adjunct of Y, then Y is an argument of X because the presence of Y in a sentence is necessary for X to occur.
S2: It is not necessarily true that if Y is an argument of X, then X is Y's adjunct.
Given the sentences S1 and S2, choose the option that explains why S2 cannot be derived from S1.
S1: Deadpool was interested in Wolverine's description of morphosyntax.
S2: *What was Deadpool interested in Wolverine's description of?