Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks for the specific legal title of the landmark judgment commonly referred to as the "Second Judges case."
Step 2: Key Concepts and Approach:
The appointment of judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts under Articles 124(2) and 217(1) underwent massive evolution through a series of judicial interventions.
We need to outline the three primary "Judges Cases" that led to the establishment of the modern Collegium system.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
• First Judges Case (1981): In S.P. Gupta v. Union of India, the Supreme Court held that the word "consultation" in Article 124 does not mean "concurrence." This gave the executive ultimate supremacy in judicial appointments.
• Second Judges Case (1993): In Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) v. Union of India, a 9-judge bench overruled S.P. Gupta. It held that "consultation" means "concurrence" and introduced the Collegium system.
• Genesis of the Collegium: The Court held that the Chief Justice of India (CJI) must consult with two senior-most colleagues, and their collective opinion is binding on the Executive.
• Third Judges Case (1998): In Re Special Reference case, the Court expanded the collegium to include the CJI and four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The Second Judges case is the Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association & Ors. v. Union of India (1993).