Question:

Two statements are given. Choose the correct option based on the statements
Statements :
1. The Supreme Court can review its own judgements
2. Public Interest Litigation can be filed directly in the Supreme Court

Show Hint

Under Article 137, the Supreme Court is not bound by its own previous decisions and can review them.
PILs are a powerful tool for social change and can be filed in either the SC (under Article 32) or any HC (under Article 226).
Updated On: Jun 30, 2026
  • Only (1) is true
  • Only (2) is true
  • Both (1) and (2) are true
  • Both (1) and (2) are false
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question contains two statements regarding the procedural powers of the Supreme Court of India: its power of judicial review of its own judgments, and the filing of Public Interest Litigations (PIL).

Step 2: Key Concept or Approach:
Refer to Article 137 of the Constitution (review jurisdiction) and the judicial evolution of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India.

Step 3: Detailed Explanation:

• Let us analyze

Statement 1: "The Supreme Court can review its own judgements"
- Under

Article 137 of the Constitution of India, the Supreme Court has the power to review any judgment pronounced or order made by it.
- This power is exercised to correct any "error apparent on the face of the record" or to prevent a miscarriage of justice.
- Therefore, Statement 1 is true.

• Let us analyze

Statement 2: "Public Interest Litigation can be filed directly in the Supreme Court"
- Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is a legal mechanism introduced in India in the late 1970s and early 1980s (championed by Justice P.N. Bhagwati and Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer).
- It relaxes the traditional rule of "locus standi", allowing any public-spirited citizen or organization to file a petition on behalf of marginalized sections of society.
- A PIL can be filed directly in the Supreme Court under

Article 32 of the Constitution (if a fundamental right of the public is violated) or in High Courts under

Article 226.
- Therefore, Statement 2 is true.

• Since both statements are true, the correct option is Option (C).


Step 4: Final Answer:
Both Statement 1 and 2 are true, which corresponds to Option (C).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0