Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question contains two statements regarding the procedural powers of the Supreme Court of India: its power of judicial review of its own judgments, and the filing of Public Interest Litigations (PIL).
Step 2: Key Concept or Approach:
Refer to Article 137 of the Constitution (review jurisdiction) and the judicial evolution of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
• Let us analyze
Statement 1: "The Supreme Court can review its own judgements"
- Under
Article 137 of the Constitution of India, the Supreme Court has the power to review any judgment pronounced or order made by it.
- This power is exercised to correct any "error apparent on the face of the record" or to prevent a miscarriage of justice.
- Therefore, Statement 1 is true.
• Let us analyze
Statement 2: "Public Interest Litigation can be filed directly in the Supreme Court"
- Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is a legal mechanism introduced in India in the late 1970s and early 1980s (championed by Justice P.N. Bhagwati and Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer).
- It relaxes the traditional rule of "locus standi", allowing any public-spirited citizen or organization to file a petition on behalf of marginalized sections of society.
- A PIL can be filed directly in the Supreme Court under
Article 32 of the Constitution (if a fundamental right of the public is violated) or in High Courts under
Article 226.
- Therefore, Statement 2 is true.
• Since both statements are true, the correct option is Option (C).
Step 4: Final Answer:
Both Statement 1 and 2 are true, which corresponds to Option (C).