Question:
The UNCITRAL Model Law and Rules do not become part of the Arbitration Act so as to become an aid to construe the provisions of the Act – held in the case of:
The UNCITRAL Model Law and Rules do not become part of the Arbitration Act so as to become an aid to construe the provisions of the Act – held in the case of:
Show Hint
The UNCITRAL Model Law is not automatically incorporated into national arbitration laws, unless explicitly stated by the legislation.
Updated On: Oct 31, 2025
- Union of India Vs East Coast Boat Builders and Engineers Ltd.
- Union of India Vs M.C. Mehta
- Tata Press Ltd Vs Union of India
- Union of India Vs Indian Change Chrome Ltd
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the UNCITRAL Model Law.
The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration is a framework that serves as a guideline for countries to adopt in their national laws. However, in India, the UNCITRAL Model Law and Rules do not automatically form part of the Arbitration Act and cannot be used to interpret the Act's provisions unless specifically referenced.
Step 2: Explanation of the options.
- (a) Union of India Vs East Coast Boat Builders and Engineers Ltd.: In this case, it was held that the UNCITRAL Model Law and Rules do not automatically become part of the Arbitration Act.
- (b) Union of India Vs M.C. Mehta: This case does not relate to the application of the UNCITRAL Model Law.
- (c) Tata Press Ltd Vs Union of India: This case is unrelated to the issue discussed here.
- (d) Union of India Vs Indian Change Chrome Ltd: This case is not relevant to the application of the UNCITRAL Model Law.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Thus, the correct answer is (a) Union of India Vs East Coast Boat Builders and Engineers Ltd.
The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration is a framework that serves as a guideline for countries to adopt in their national laws. However, in India, the UNCITRAL Model Law and Rules do not automatically form part of the Arbitration Act and cannot be used to interpret the Act's provisions unless specifically referenced.
Step 2: Explanation of the options.
- (a) Union of India Vs East Coast Boat Builders and Engineers Ltd.: In this case, it was held that the UNCITRAL Model Law and Rules do not automatically become part of the Arbitration Act.
- (b) Union of India Vs M.C. Mehta: This case does not relate to the application of the UNCITRAL Model Law.
- (c) Tata Press Ltd Vs Union of India: This case is unrelated to the issue discussed here.
- (d) Union of India Vs Indian Change Chrome Ltd: This case is not relevant to the application of the UNCITRAL Model Law.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Thus, the correct answer is (a) Union of India Vs East Coast Boat Builders and Engineers Ltd.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top AIBE Legal Studies Questions
- The concept of freedom of trade and commerce mentioned in the Indian Constitution is motivated from the experience of the following country?
- Which of the following writ is issued to enforce the performance of public duties by the authority?
- Which of the following Constitutional Amendment Act had made the provision for publishing Hindi Translation of the Constitution?
- Which of the following is the landmark judgment on the Colourable legislation?
- Which of the following Constitutional Amendment Act was passed in light of the advisory opinion received in Re Berubari case?
View More Questions
Top AIBE Arbitration Law Questions
- A dispute arises between ABC Ltd. and XYZ Pvt. Ltd. regarding a contract that both parties had entered into. The agreement includes an arbitration clause, which states that any disputes shall be referred to arbitration. However, the parties fail to agree on the appointment of an arbitrator. Which of the following provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 would be applicable to resolve the issue of the appointment of an arbitrator?
- Kiran and Meera are involved in an arbitration, where Kiran was awarded Rs. 10 lakhs as compensation. Meera refuses to pay the amount, arguing that the award was not enforceable because of certain procedural irregularities in the arbitration process. Kiran decides to approach the court to enforce the arbitral award.
Which of the following provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 governs the enforcement of an arbitral award? - According to Section 7(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, an arbitration agreement is in writing if it is contained in:
- Waiver of right to object deviance from arbitration agreement is mentioned under -------- of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
- The Arbitration Act 1996 repeals:
View More Questions
Top AIBE Questions
- The concept of freedom of trade and commerce mentioned in the Indian Constitution is motivated from the experience of the following country?
- Which of the following writ is issued to enforce the performance of public duties by the authority?
- Which of the following Constitutional Amendment Act had made the provision for publishing Hindi Translation of the Constitution?
- Which of the following is the landmark judgment on the Colourable legislation?
- Which of the following Constitutional Amendment Act was passed in light of the advisory opinion received in Re Berubari case?
View More Questions