Step 1: Understanding the Question.
Let \(S\) be Sales and \(P\) be Profit for 2005-06, and \(S'\) and \(P'\) be Sales and Profit for 2006-07. We are told \(P' = 1.32P\), since profit rose by 32%. We need the percentage rise in Sales, that is \(\frac{S'-S}{S}\times 100\). Since Profit = Sales minus Expenses, we can write \(S = P + 1220\) and \(S' = P' + 1400\), using the expense figures from Statement (1).
Step 2: Check Statement (1) alone.
Statement (1) gives both years' expenses, so \(S = P+1220\) and \(S'=1.32P+1400\). This is two equations in three unknowns (\(S\), \(S'\), \(P\)), so we cannot pin down a single value for the percentage rise. Statement (1) alone is not enough.
Step 3: Check Statement (2) alone.
Statement (2) only tells us \(S' = 4300\). We still do not know \(P\), \(P'\), or \(S\), so the percentage rise cannot be found. Statement (2) alone is not enough.
Step 4: Combine both statements.
Using \(S' = P'+1400\) and \(S'=4300\) from Statement (2), we get \(P' = 4300-1400=2900\). Since \(P'=1.32P\), \(P = \frac{2900}{1.32} \approx 2196.97\). Then from Statement (1), \(S = P+1220 \approx 2196.97+1220=3416.97\). Now both \(S\) and \(S'\) are known numbers, so the percentage rise is
\[ \frac{S'-S}{S}\times 100 = \frac{4300-3416.97}{3416.97}\times 100 \approx 25.84\% \]
Step 5: Final Answer.
Only when both statements are used together can the percentage rise in sales be pinned down to one number, so neither statement alone is enough but both together are.
\[ \boxed{\text{Both statements together are sufficient, neither alone is sufficient}} \]