Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The "one gene-one enzyme" hypothesis, proposed by Beadle and Tatum, suggested that each gene encodes a single specific enzyme that controls a single metabolic step.
While this hypothesis was important for early genetics, subsequent molecular discoveries showed that the relationship between genes and enzymes is more complex.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Let us evaluate the arguments challenging the hypothesis:
(A) is correct because many complex enzymes are oligomers composed of multiple polypeptide subunits, with each subunit encoded by a different gene (e.g., lactate dehydrogenase or hemoglobin).
This led to the revised "one gene-one polypeptide" hypothesis.
(B) is correct because many genes encode non-enzyme proteins (such as structural collagen or hemoglobin) or functional RNA molecules (such as tRNA and rRNA) that are never translated into proteins.
(C) is incorrect in this context.
While introns do not code for amino acids, their presence within eukaryotic genes does not directly challenge the functional concept that a gene's active exons map to a final protein product.
(D) is correct because alternative splicing allows a single pre-mRNA transcript to be processed into different mature mRNA isoforms, enabling a single gene to encode multiple distinct polypeptide chains.
Therefore, statements (A), (B), and (D) are the primary reasons challenging the "one gene-one enzyme" hypothesis.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The correct combination is (A), (B), and (D) only, corresponding to option (C).