Comprehension

The endless struggle between the flesh and the spirit found an end in Greek art. The Greek artists were unaware of it. They were spiritual materialists, never denying the importance of the body and ever seeing in the body a spiritual significance. Mysticism on the whole was alien to the Greeks, thinkers as they were. Thought and mysticism never go well together and there is little symbolism in Greek art. Athena was not a symbol of wisdom but an embodiment of it and her statues were beautiful grave women, whose seriousness might mark them as wise, but who were marked in no other way. The Apollo Belvedere is not a symbol of the sun, nor the Versailles Artemis of the moon. There could be nothing less akin to the ways of symbolism than their beautiful, normal humanity. Nor did decoration really interest the Greeks. In all their art they were preoccupied with what they wanted to express, not with ways of expressing it, and lovely expression, merely as lovely expression, did not appeal to them at all.

Greek art is intellectual art, the art of men who were clear and lucid thinkers, and it is therefore plain art. Artists than whom the world has never seen greater, men endowed with the spirit’s best gift, found their natural method of expression in the simplicity and clarity which are the endowment of the unclouded reason. “Nothing in excess,” the Greek axiom of art, is the dictum of men who would brush aside all obscuring, entangling superfluity, and see clearly, plainly, unadorned, what they wished to express. Structure belongs in an especial degree to the province of the mind in art, and architectonics were pre-eminently a mark of the Greek. The power that made a unified whole of the trilogy of a Greek tragedy, that envisioned the sure, precise, decisive scheme of the Greek statue, found its most conspicuous expression in Greek architecture. The Greek temple is the creation, par excellence, of mind and spirit in equilibrium.

A Hindoo temple is a conglomeration of adornment. The lines of the building are completely hidden by the decorations. Sculptured figures and ornaments crowd its surface, stand out from it in thick masses, break it up into a bewildering series of irregular tiers. It is not a unity but a collection, rich, confused. It looks like something not planned but built this way and that as the ornament required. The conviction underlying it can be perceived: each bit of the exquisitely wrought detail had a mystical meaning and the temple’s exterior was important only as a means for the artist to inscribe thereon the symbols of the truth. It is decoration, not architecture.

Again, the gigantic temples of Egypt, those massive immensities of granite which look as if only the power that moves in the earthquake were mighty enough to bring them into existence, are something other than the creation of geometry balanced by beauty. The science and the spirit are there, but what is there most of all is force, unhuman force, calm but tremendous, overwhelming. It reduces to nothingness all that belongs to man. He is annihilated. The Egyptian architects were possessed by the consciousness of the awful, irresistible domination of the ways of nature; they had no thought to give to the insignificant atom that was man.

Greek architecture of the great age is the expression of men who were, first of all, intellectual artists, kept firmly within the visible world by their mind, but, only second to that, lovers of the human world. The Greek temple is the perfect expression of the pure intellect illumined by the spirit. No other great buildings anywhere approach its simplicity. In the Parthenon straight columns rise to plain capitals; a pediment is sculptured in bold relief; there is nothing more. And yet — here is the Greek miracle — this absolute simplicity of structure is alone in majesty of beauty among all the temples and cathedrals and palaces of the world. Majestic but human, truly Greek. No superhuman force as in Egypt; no strange supernatural shapes as in India; the Parthenon is the home of humanity at ease, calm, ordered, sure of itself and the world. The Greeks flung a challenge to nature in the fullness of their joyous strength. They set their temples on the summit of a hill overlooking the wide sea, outlined against the circle of the sky. They would build what was more beautiful than hill and sea and sky and greater than all these. It matters not at all if the temple is large or small; one never thinks of the size. It matters not how much it is in ruins. A few white columns dominate the lofty height at Sunion as securely as the great mass of the Parthenon dominates all the sweep of sea and land around Athens. To the Greek architect man was the master of the world. His mind could understand its laws; his spirit could discover its beauty.

Question: 1

"The Greeks flung a challenge to nature in the fullness of their joyous strength." Which of the following best captures the 'challenge' that is being referred to?

Show Hint

Look for answers that discuss how the Greeks aimed to surpass nature in terms of intellectual and spiritual beauty rather than just size.
Updated On: Oct 27, 2026
  • To build a monument matching the background colours of the sky and the sea.
  • To build a monument bigger than nature's creations.
  • To build monuments that were more appealing to the mind and spirit than nature’s creations.
  • To build a small but architecturally perfect creation.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The passage mentions that Greek architecture focused on creating monuments that appealed to both the mind and spirit, transcending nature’s creations. This is the "challenge" the Greeks took on, trying to surpass nature in intellectual and spiritual beauty. Therefore, the Correct Answer is: \[ \boxed{(3) \ \text{To build monuments that were more appealing to the mind and spirit than nature’s creations.}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of Greek architecture, according to the passage?

Show Hint

Focus on how the passage contrasts Greek architecture with that of other cultures, particularly in terms of spirituality.
Updated On: Oct 27, 2026
  • A lack of excess.
  • Simplicity of form.
  • Expression of intellect.
  • Mystic spirituality.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

The passage emphasizes that Greek architecture is intellectual, simple, and expressive of the human spirit, but it specifically rejects mysticism and spirituality, which are characteristics found more in other cultures like India or Egypt. Therefore, the Correct Answer is: \[ \boxed{(4) \ \text{Mystic spirituality.}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

From the passage, which of the following combinations can be inferred to be correct?

Show Hint

Identify which elements from the passage reflect the core attributes of the Parthenon, especially simplicity.
Updated On: Oct 27, 2026
  • Hindu temple = power of nature.
  • Parthenon = simplicity.
  • Egyptian temple = mysticism.
  • Greek temple = symbolism.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

The passage clearly attributes simplicity to the Parthenon, reflecting the Greek ideal of clarity and intellectual expression. The other pairs do not align with the descriptions provided in the passage. Therefore, the Correct Answer is: \[ \boxed{(2) \ \text{Parthenon = simplicity.}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

According to the passage, what conception of man can be inferred from Egyptian architecture?

Show Hint

Focus on the portrayal of man in Egyptian architecture as overwhelmed by the power of nature, rather than as the center of creation.
Updated On: Oct 27, 2026
  • Man is the centre of creation.
  • Egyptian temples see man from unhuman forces.
  • Temples celebrate man's victory over nature.
  • Man is inconsequential before the tremendous force of nature.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

The passage describes Egyptian architecture as monumental, forceful, and overwhelming, symbolizing nature's dominance over man. This suggests that man is insignificant in the face of nature's immense power. Therefore, the Correct Answer is: \[ \boxed{(4) \ \text{Man is inconsequential before the tremendous force of nature.}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5

According to the passage, which of the following best explains why there is little symbolism in Greek art?

Show Hint

Look for answers that explain the Greek emphasis on intellectualism and the rejection of mysticism in their art.
Updated On: Oct 27, 2026
  • The Greeks focused on thought rather than mysticism.
  • The struggle between the flesh and the spirit found an end in Greek art.
  • Greek artists were spiritual materialists.
  • Greek statues were embodiments rather than symbols of qualities.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

The passage explains that the Greeks were intellectuals who focused on human expression rather than mysticism, and this focus on reason and clarity led to a lack of symbolism in their art. Therefore, the Correct Answer is: \[ \boxed{(1) \ \text{The Greeks focused on thought rather than mysticism.}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top CAT Questions

View More Questions