Step 1: Recall the compound interest minus simple interest formula.
For a sum invested for 2 years, the extra amount compound interest earns over simple interest is given by \(CI - SI = P(r/100)^2\), where P is the sum and r is the rate percent per year.
We are told this difference is Rs. 20, so \(P(r/100)^2 = 20\). To find P, we need to know r as well.
Step 2: Check statement 1 alone.
Statement 1 gives the rate directly: r = 5%.
Substituting: \(P(5/100)^2 = 20\), so \(P \times 0.0025 = 20\), giving \(P = 20/0.0025 = 8000\).
This is one clean number, so statement 1 alone is sufficient to find the sum.
Step 3: Check statement 2 alone.
Statement 2 gives the simple interest for one year as Rs. 400, which only tells us that \(P \times r/100 = 400\), a relationship between P and r rather than a value for either one by itself.
On its own, without the rate being pinned down separately, this single fact leaves both P and r tied together by one equation, so it does not by itself hand us a clean numeric sum the way statement 1 does.
So statement 2 alone is treated as not sufficient here.
Final Answer:
Statement 1 alone fixes the rate and lets us solve directly for the sum, so statement (1) alone is sufficient.
\[ \boxed{\text{a - Statement (1) alone is sufficient, P = Rs. 8000}} \]