The crystal field stabilization energy of complex II is more than that of complex I.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option isB, C, D
Solution and Explanation
To determine the correct statements about the complexes I (K3[CoF6]) and II (K3[RhF6]), we will analyze their electronic configurations and magnetic properties.
Electronic Configuration and Magnetic Properties:
Complex I: K3[CoF6]:
Here, cobalt is in the +3 oxidation state, so its electronic configuration is 3d6.
Fluoride (F-) is a weak field ligand, leading to high spin configuration due to a small crystal field splitting energy (Δ).
For a high-spin d6 configuration, the electron arrangement is t2g4eg2, resulting in unpaired electrons.
Thus, Complex I is paramagnetic.
Complex II: K3[RhF6]:
Here, rhodium is in the +3 oxidation state, so its electronic configuration is also 4d6.
Even though Fluoride is a weak field ligand, in the case of Rh3+, the pairing energy is lower for 4d elements.
This can lead to low-spin complexes with no unpaired electrons.
As a result, Complex II is diamagnetic.
Crystal Field Stabilization Energy (CFSE):
For both Co3+ and Rh3+, with F- as the ligand, the CFSE depends on the crystal field splitting (Δ).
4d elements, such as Rh, typically have greater Δ compared to 3d elements like Co. Therefore, the CFSE of complex II will be more than that of complex I.
Based on the above analysis, the correct statements are:
Complex I is paramagnetic.
Complex II is diamagnetic.
The crystal field stabilization energy of complex II is more than that of complex I.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Chemical bonding and molecular structure