Step 1: Understand bonding in metal carbonyls.
Metal carbonyl bonding involves $\sigma$-donation from CO to metal and $\pi$-back bonding from metal to COThe extent of $\pi$-back bonding affects the C–O bond strength
Step 2: Effect of $\pi$-back bonding on C–O bond length.
Stronger $\pi$-back bonding weakens the C–O bond and increases its bond lengthThus, more electron-rich metal centers give longer C–O bonds
Step 3: Analyze oxidation states.
\[
\text{Na}_2[\text{Fe(CO)}_4] \Rightarrow \text{Fe}^{-2}
\]
\[
\text{Na}[\text{Co(CO)}_4] \Rightarrow \text{Co}^{-1}
\]
\[
\text{Ni(CO)}_4 \Rightarrow \text{Ni}^0
\]
Step 4: Compare electron density on metal.
Fe$^{2-}$ is most electron-rich, followed by Co$^{-1}$, and then Ni$^{0}$
Step 5: Compare $\pi$-back bonding.
\[
\text{Fe}^{2-} > \text{Co}^{-1} > \text{Ni}^0
\]
Thus, $\pi$-back bonding decreases in the same order
Step 6: Relate to C–O bond length.
Greater $\pi$-back bonding $\Rightarrow$ weaker C–O bond $\Rightarrow$ longer bond length
\[
\text{Na}_2[\text{Fe(CO)}_4] > \text{Na}[\text{Co(CO)}_4] > \text{Ni(CO)}_4
\]
Step 7: Conclusion.
\[
\boxed{\text{Na}_2[\text{Fe(CO)}_4] > \text{Na}[\text{Co(CO)}_4] > \text{Ni(CO)}_4}
\]