Question

Statement: Should there be a strict upper age limit for candidates appearing in government job examinations? Argument I: No, age has nothing to do with a person's ability to do a job. Argument II: Yes, it ensures a steady inflow of younger people into the workforce and gives fair opportunity across generations.

• A. Only argument I is strong
• B. Only argument II is strong
• C. Both arguments are strong
• D. Neither argument is strong

Hint:

Ask whether each argument gives a concrete, policy-relevant reason or just an unqualified sweeping statement.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is B

Argument I is weak because 'age has nothing to do with ability' is a sweeping, unqualified claim. Argument II is strong because it gives a concrete workforce-planning benefit and a fairness rationale that directly bears on the policy. Only argument II is strong. The correct option is 'Only argument II is strong'.