Question:

Statement: Should smoking be completely banned in all public places in the country? Argument I: Yes, it protects non-smokers from the harmful effects of passive smoking. Argument II: No, it violates the personal freedom of individuals to smoke wherever they wish.

Show Hint

Judge each argument on whether it is directly relevant to the policy question and backed by a specific, realistic reason, not just a general principle.
Updated On: Jul 8, 2026
  • Only argument I is strong
  • Only argument II is strong
  • Both arguments are strong
  • Neither argument is strong
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Argument I is strong because protecting the health of non-smokers in shared public spaces is a substantial, directly relevant public-interest reason. Argument II is weak because personal freedom does not extend to harming others in public places, so it does not outweigh the health concern. Only argument I is strong. The correct option is 'Only argument I is strong'.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top NMAT Data Interpretation & Logical Reasoning (DILR) Questions

View More Questions

Top NMAT Questions

View More Questions