The two salaries start in the ratio 2:3, and after Rs. 4000 is added to each, the ratio becomes 40:57. Since 40:57 simplifies to \( \frac{40}{57} \), we can test each candidate value for the larger salary (Jimmy's) by working backward to the smaller salary and checking whether adding 4000 to both reproduces this exact ratio.
- Rs. 34000: If the larger original salary is 34000, then since the ratio is 2:3, the smaller salary is \( 34000 \times \frac{2}{3} \approx 22666.67 \). Adding Rs. 4000 to each: \( 26666.67 : 38000 \). Dividing both by \( 666.67 \) gives \( 40 : 57 \), matching the required ratio exactly.
- Rs. 46800: If the larger salary is 46800, the smaller would be \( 46800 \times \frac{2}{3} = 31200 \). Adding 4000 to each gives \( 35200 : 50800 \), which simplifies to roughly \( 39.6 : 57.2 \), not a clean 40:57 match.
- Rs. 36700: The smaller salary would be \( 36700 \times \frac{2}{3} \approx 24466.67 \). Adding 4000 gives \( 28466.67 : 40700 \), which does not reduce cleanly to 40:57.
- Rs. 50000: The smaller salary would be \( 50000 \times \frac{2}{3} \approx 33333.33 \). Adding 4000 gives \( 37333.33 : 54000 \), again not matching 40:57 precisely.
Only Rs. 34000 as the larger salary produces a smaller salary that, after adding Rs. 4000 to both, reduces exactly to the ratio 40:57.
Therefore, the correct answer is Rs. 34000.