Question:

Read the passage below and answer the question that follows.

The Bistupur-Sakchi corner needs a speed-breaker. Loyola school children cross this intersection, on their way to the school, and many a times do not check out for traffic. I get to read regular reports of cars and other vehicles hitting children. I know that speed-breakers are irritating for drivers, and I know that children cannot be protected from every danger, but this is one of the worst intersections in town. There needs to be a speed-breaker so that vehicles have to slow down and the children be made safer.

Which of the following types of argument is used in the passage above?

Show Hint

Check whether the passage uses numbers, a comparison to something else, one child's specific story, or just the emotional pull of children's safety.
Updated On: Jul 10, 2026
  • Analogy: comparing the intersection to something dangerous.
  • Emotive: referring to the safety of children to get people interested.
  • Statistical analysis: noting the number of children hit by vehicles.
  • Personalization: telling the story of one child's near accident at the intersection.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The passage is a short opinion piece asking for a speed-breaker at the Bistupur-Sakchi corner. We need to name the type of argument the writer uses to make the case.

Step 2: Key Idea:
An argument can be built in different ways: by analogy (comparing two situations), by statistics (using numbers), by personalization (telling one specific person's story), or by an emotive appeal (playing on feelings people already care about). Check the passage against each of these.

Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
The writer gives no count of accidents or injured children, only "regular reports," so there is no statistical analysis, ruling out option (CC).
No single child's incident is described with a name or specific detail, so it is not personalization, ruling out option (DD).
The writer never compares the intersection to some other dangerous thing, like a cliff or a warzone, so it is not an analogy, ruling out option (AA).
What remains is that the writer keeps returning to the safety of "school children," a subject that reliably worries most readers on its own, without needing data or a specific story. This is an emotive argument, it works by appealing to feeling rather than by proof or comparison.

Step 4: Final Answer:
The argument used is emotive, matching option (BB).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top XAT Verbal and Logical Ability Questions

View More Questions

Top XAT Critical Reasoning Questions

View More Questions