Read the passage and answer the question that follows.
Vaatsalya Healthcare is one among a rapidly spreading group of "for profit" social enterprises that serve the poor and still bring in profit. Mumbai based Ziqitza, an ambulance services company, is another; it never refuses a patient for lack of money and charges only Rs. 50 to Rs. 200. Entrepreneurial minds with a social conscience are now building such models at a much faster pace than before. Varun Sahni, country director of Acumen Fund, a US based social fund that invests in companies targeting low income communities, says there has been a boom in such enterprises over the past two years, with about 1,000 of them now operating in India. These enterprises work across healthcare, education, rural energy, agriculture, arts and crafts, banking and more. "For profit" entrepreneurs care about social and environmental impact along with financial returns, and because they are answerable to investors, they try to expand the business rapidly. SKS Microfinance, for instance, started in 1998 and now has over 900,000 customers, 440 branches and an outstanding loan disbursement of over Rs. 452 crore as of August 2007.
Which of the following companies does not illustrate the idea explained by the author?
This question is based on the passage about "for profit" social enterprises, organisations that serve poor and low income communities while still running as a real, profit making business. The passage names several such enterprises and one investor. We need to pick the option that is NOT itself an enterprise of this kind.
Three of the four options, SKS Microfinance, Ziqitza and Vaatsalya Healthcare, are enterprises that sell a service or product directly to low income customers and earn a profit doing it. Acumen Fund is different: it is a fund that finances such enterprises rather than running one, so it does not illustrate the author's idea in the same direct sense.
Let's summarize:
So the company that does not illustrate the author's idea is Acumen Fund, option B.