The question explores the philosophical differences between the educational approaches of Socrates and Aristotle, based on the given comprehension passage. Let's analyze the correct answer step-by-step.
Step 1: Understanding Socrates' Approach
Socrates emphasized the importance of dialogic learning, which involves questioning students to facilitate reflection and self-discovery. His method, often called the Socratic Method, encourages critical thinking and the elicitation of ideas from the learners themselves.
Step 2: Understanding Aristotle's Approach
Aristotle, on the other hand, believed in the systematic guidance of students by teachers. He advocated for the use of repetition to develop good habits in students, an approach that contrasts with Socrates' method of questioning.
Step 3: Comparing the Approaches
Based on the passage, Socrates' approach involves continuous questioning to draw out a student’s understanding, whereas Aristotle's method involves repetition to instill habits. Therefore, the primary difference lies in Socrates' use of questioning versus Aristotle's emphasis on systematic guidance and repetition.
Conclusion:
The correct option is: Aristotle felt the need for repetition to develop good habits in students; Socrates felt that students need to be constantly questioned.
To answer the question, "Why do educationists consider philosophy a 'weak and woolly' field?", we need to analyze the comprehension passage provided:
Now, let's evaluate the given options:
Conclusion: The correct answer is "It is not practically applicable." The passage confirms that the philosophical approach is seen as too theoretical for immediate practical application, which is why some educationists view it as "weak and woolly."
To determine whether Plato's beliefs about education were democratic, let's analyze the relevant portion of the passage.
Plato was a profound educational thinker, and his philosophy of education is discussed in his work "The Republic." According to the passage:
This indicates that although Plato acknowledged the distribution of talent across all social classes, he did not propose a system that provides equal educational opportunities to everyone. Instead, education served the purpose of grooming a select few to act as leaders or guardians, which aligns more with a meritocratic or hierarchical system rather than a fully democratic one.
The correct answer is "Yes" because, within the context of the passage, while Plato's approach recognized talent across classes, it did not advocate for universal education in the democratic sense (i.e., equal opportunity for all).
To determine why Aquinas proposed a model of education that did not emphasize facts, we need to delve into the educational philosophies mentioned in the given passage. Let's break down the relevant parts step by step:
Thus, the answer reflects the philosophical underpinning that facts may become obsolete, whereas reasoning and principles remain constant and universally applicable across time.
Write any four problems faced by the animals that thrive in forests and oceans: 
Verbal to Non-Verbal:
A stain is an unwanted mark of discolouration on a fabric caused due to contact with another substance which cannot be removed by the normal washing process. Stains can be grouped on the basis of their origin, e.g. tea, coffee and fruits come from vegetable source. Stains from shoe polish, tar, oil paints come under grease stains. Animal stains comprise of stains formed by milk, blood and eggs, whereas marks on your clothes after sitting on an iron bench are those of rust and come under mineral stains. Then there are stains that are formed due to dye, into perspiration which can be categorised under miscellaneous stains. Read the given passage and complete the table. Suggest a suitable title. 
