Question:

Human decision-making relies on cognitive shortcuts known as heuristics. While these shortcuts allow rapid decisions in uncertain situations, they also cause predictable errors. Understanding how heuristics shape judgment can help in designing better decision-making environments. 

What is the main idea? 

  1. Heuristics should be eliminated from human thinking.
  2. Heuristics are more harmful than useful.
  3. Understanding heuristics helps improve decision systems.
  4. Human decisions cannot be improved.

Show Hint

For main-idea questions, avoid extreme or one-sided statements. Look for the option that captures the author's overall purpose, not just an example or detail.
Updated On: Jul 4, 2026
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution - 1

Approach: The main idea is the passage's destination, not its starting facts. Read the last sentence \(--\) in tight paragraphs it usually states the purpose.

Step 1: Track the arc. Sentence 1 defines heuristics as cognitive shortcuts. Sentence 2 grants they enable fast decisions but also cause predictable errors (balanced view). Sentence 3 lands the point: understanding how heuristics shape judgment can help design better decision-making environments. That last clause is the takeaway.

Step 2: Match. Option 3 \(--\) "understanding heuristics helps improve decision systems" \(--\) restates that final, purpose-stating sentence exactly.

Step 3: Eliminate. Option 1 ("eliminate heuristics") is too extreme; the passage never asks to remove them. Option 2 ("more harmful than useful") distorts the balanced tone \(--\) the passage credits their usefulness. Option 4 ("decisions cannot be improved") flatly contradicts the optimistic closing line.

Main idea: \( \text{Option 3} \)
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

Approach (component checklist): A correct main idea must contain both required parts of this passage's point, the subject (heuristics, cognitive shortcuts) and the claim (that understanding them helps build better decision systems). Score each option against these two components.

Option 1 keeps the subject but distorts the claim into “eliminate heuristics,” which the passage never asks for, fails the claim check. Option 2 keeps the subject but flips the claim into a purely negative verdict (“more harmful than useful”), contradicting the passage's balanced framing, fails the claim check. Option 4 drops the subject entirely and asserts something the passage never says (“decisions cannot be improved”), failing both checks and actually contradicting the passage's closing point. Option 3, “understanding heuristics helps improve decision systems,” keeps the subject intact and states the claim exactly as the passage's final sentence does, passes both checks.

Main idea: Option 3.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top CAT Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension (VARC) Questions

View More Questions

Top CAT Reading Comprehension Questions

View More Questions