Question

Part : I :: Class : II

I. (A) Section (B) Whole (C) School (D) Students

II. (P) Student (Q) School (R) Teachers (S) Room

• A. AR
• B. BQ
• C. CP
• D. DS

Hint:

Think of Part and Class as smaller units that sit inside something bigger.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is B

This analogy uses a part-to-whole relationship. A Part sits inside a Whole, so we need a word for Class that shows it sits inside a bigger unit in the same way.

1. Option A (AR: Section, Teachers): This gives Part : Section :: Class : Teachers. A section already means close to a part itself, and Teachers is not a container for a Class, so this fails.
2. Option B (BQ: Whole, School): This gives Part : Whole :: Class : School. A part sits inside a whole, and a class sits inside a school, so the relationship carries through cleanly.
3. Option C (CP: School, Student): This gives Part : School :: Class : Student, which flips the container and content roles and does not match.
4. Option D (DS: Students, Room): This gives Part : Students :: Class : Room, pairing two ideas with no consistent logic between them.

Option B is the only pair where both sides describe a smaller unit sitting inside a larger one.

Let's summarize:

• Look for the exact container-content direction on both sides of a part-whole analogy.

So the answer is option B.