Question:

Paragraph: 

While technological tools are becoming increasingly efficient, people tend to over-rely on them, assuming automation eliminates the need for judgment. However, technology can fail, misinterpret inputs, or reinforce biases, making human oversight essential. An effective system, therefore, blends automated precision with critical human decision-making. 

Question: 

Which option best summarizes the paragraph?

Show Hint

A good summary condenses the core argument by combining the problem and the resolution: over-reliance on automation is risky, so balanced human–machine collaboration is necessary.
Updated On: Jul 4, 2026
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution - 1

Approach: A summary must carry the author's main claim plus the resolution, in proportion. Find the paragraph's pivot "However" and make sure the summary keeps both halves — the warning and the balanced fix.

Step 1 — Map the three beats. (i) Tools are efficient and people over-rely on them, assuming automation removes the need for judgment. (ii) However, technology can fail, misread inputs, or reinforce biases, so oversight is essential. (iii) Therefore the ideal system blends automated precision with human decision-making.

Step 2 — Identify the load-bearing idea. Beat (iii) is the conclusion; beat (ii) is the reason. A faithful summary is: automation is useful but fallible, so keep humans in the loop; best systems combine both.

Step 3 — Build the summary. "Although automation is efficient, over-reliance is risky because it can err or amplify bias; effective systems therefore combine machine precision with essential human oversight." This keeps contrast, cause, and resolution, and drops no main beat.

Why typical wrong summaries fail: "Technology is unreliable and should be avoided" — distorts; the author keeps automation. "Humans are better than machines" — the paragraph argues partnership, not superiority. "Automation removes the need for judgment" — that is the very view the author refutes. "Bias is the biggest tech problem" — over-narrows one example into the thesis.

\[ \boxed{\text{Summary: automation is efficient yet fallible, so the best systems fuse it with human oversight.}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

Proportional-weighting test: The paragraph spends its opening granting a real strength to automation, its middle citing real risks, and its close proposing a partnership. A correct central-idea option must give roughly that same weight to all three parts, not amplify one part into the whole message.

Check the surviving option against this weighting: it grants automation's efficiency, states the risk (errors, misread inputs, reinforced bias) as the reason oversight is needed, and closes on the same blended-system idea the paragraph closes on — the weighting matches almost exactly. An option that turns the risk section into the entire message ("avoid technology") over-weights one part; an option built only from the opening ("automation removes the need for judgment") over-weights another part in the wrong direction, reversing it; an option built only from one example ("bias is the biggest problem") mistakes a supporting detail for the main claim.

\[ \boxed{\text{Automation is efficient but fallible, so the best systems combine it with human oversight - matching the paragraph's own balance.}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top CAT Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension (VARC) Questions

View More Questions

Top CAT Para Summary Questions

View More Questions