Question:
Ms J, a banker, refuses to honour a cheque of Ms F, though Ms F had a sufficient balance. Yet, Ms F does not suffer any monetary loss. Ms F can file a case under which scenario?
Ms J, a banker, refuses to honour a cheque of Ms F, though Ms F had a sufficient balance. Yet, Ms F does not suffer any monetary loss. Ms F can file a case under which scenario?
Show Hint
“Injuria-sine-damnum” focuses on the violation of a legal right, not on actual damage. Legal injury itself is actionable.
Updated On: Oct 30, 2025
- Damnum-sine-injuria
- Res-ipsa-loquitur
- Volenti-non-fit-injuria
- Injuria-sine-damnum
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the legal principle.
“Injuria-sine-damnum” means “legal injury without actual damage.” It applies when a person’s legal right is violated, even if no physical, financial, or material damage is suffered.
Step 2: Application to the case.
Ms J, the banker, refused to honour Ms F’s cheque despite having sufficient balance. This refusal violates Ms F’s legal right as a customer to have her cheque honoured. Even though no monetary loss occurred, the legal right was infringed.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Hence, Ms F can file a case under the doctrine of “Injuria-sine-damnum.”
“Injuria-sine-damnum” means “legal injury without actual damage.” It applies when a person’s legal right is violated, even if no physical, financial, or material damage is suffered.
Step 2: Application to the case.
Ms J, the banker, refused to honour Ms F’s cheque despite having sufficient balance. This refusal violates Ms F’s legal right as a customer to have her cheque honoured. Even though no monetary loss occurred, the legal right was infringed.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Hence, Ms F can file a case under the doctrine of “Injuria-sine-damnum.”
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Law of Torts
- What must be shown before the court to obtain an injunction to stop nuisance?
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Law of Torts
- It is well recognized that actionable negligence in context of medical profession involves three constituents (i) duty to exercise due care; (ii) breach of duty and (iii) consequential damage. However, a simple lack of care, an error of judgment or an accident is not sufficient proof of negligence on part of the medical professional so long as the doctor follows the acceptable practice of the medical profession in discharge of his duties. He cannot be held liable for negligence merely because a better alternative treatment or course of treatment was available or that more skilled doctors were there who could have administered better treatment.
A medical professional may be held liable for negligence only when he is not pos sessed with the requisite qualification or skill or when he fails to exercise reasonable skill which he possesses in giving the treatment. None of the above two essential conditions for establishing negligence stand satisfied in the case at hand as no ev idence was brought on record to prove that Dr. Neeraj Sud had not exercised due diligence, care or skill which he possessed in operating the patient and giving treatment to him. When reasonable care, expected of the medical professional, is extended or rendered to the patient unless contrary is proved, it would not be a case for actionable negligence.
tracted with edits and revisions from Neeraj Sud v Jaswinder Singh 2024 INSC 825- CLAT PG - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Law of Torts
- 'Tort means a civil wrong which is not exclusively a breach of contract or breach of trust'. This definition is given in which of the following statute?
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Law of Torts
- Which among the following cases are connected to Volunti Non Fit Injuria?
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Law of Torts
- Which among the following are covered under the defences of nuisance?
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Law of Torts
View More Questions
Questions Asked in AIBE exam
- In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India hold that the rule of nemo judex in causa sua is subject to the doctrine of necessity?
- AIBE - 2025
- Administrative Law
- According to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, what is the fixed amount of compensation payable in the event of death caused by a motor vehicle accident under no-fault liability?
- AIBE - 2025
- General Law
- The grounds for decree for dissolution of marriage under Section 2 of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 are:
I. whereabouts of the husband have not been known for two years.
II. husband has been sentenced to imprisonment for a period of five years.
III. husband has failed to perform marital obligations for two years without reasonable cause.
IV. husband has neglected or failed to maintain his wife for one year.
Select the correct answer.- AIBE - 2025
- Family Laws
- Statement 1: Under the Indian Penal Code, if a person harbours an offender who has escaped custody for an offence punishable with imprisonment up to 3 years, he shall be punished with imprisonment up to 7 years.
Statement 2: The law provides an exception for harbouring or concealing by the husband or wife of the offender.- AIBE - 2025
- Indian Penal Code (IPC)
- A Statement is followed by two Conclusions, I and II.
Statement: According to the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, the Government credits ₹15,000 to the Rehabilitation Fund for each child or adolescent for whom fine has been recovered from the employer. This amount may be deposited or invested, and the interest is also payable to the child or adolescent.
Conclusions:
I. The child or adolescent is entitled not only to the credited amount but also to the interest accrued on it.
II. The Government is not required to deposit any money other than what is collected as fines from the employer.
Which one is correct?- AIBE - 2025
- Labour & Industrial Law
View More Questions