Question:

India signed and ratified the 1997 Kyoto Protocol in August 2002. India, China and other developing countries were exempt from the requirements of the Kyoto Protocol because their contribution to the emission of greenhouse gases during the industrialisation period (that is believed to be causing today's global warming and climate change) was not significant. However, the critics of the Kyoto Protocol point out that sooner or later, both India and China, along with other developing countries, will be among the leading contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. At the G-8 meeting in June 2005, India pointed out that the per capita emission rates of the developing countries are a tiny fraction of those in the developed world. Following the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, India is of the view that the major responsibility of curbing emission rests with the developed countries, which have accumulated emissions over a long period of time.

India's international negotiating position relies heavily on principles of historical responsibility, as enshrined in UNFCCC. This acknowledges that developed countries are responsible for most historical and current greenhouse gas emissions, and emphasizes that 'economic and social development are the first and overriding priorities of the developing country parties'. So India is wary of recent discussions within UNFCCC about introducing binding commitments on rapidly industrialising countries (such as Brazil, China and India) to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. India feels this contravenes the very spirit of UNFCCC.

The Indian government is already participating in global efforts through a number of programmes. For example, India's National Auto-fuel Policy mandates cleaner fuels for vehicles. The Energy Conservation Act, passed in 2001, outlines initiatives to improve energy efficiency. Similarly, the Electricity Act of 2003 encourages the use of renewable energy. Recent trends in importing natural gas and encouraging the adoption of clean coal technologies show that India has been making real efforts. The government is also keen to launch a National Mission on Biodiesel, using about 11 million hectares of land to produce biodiesel by 2011-2012. India ratified the Paris Climate Agreement on 2 October 2016.

What according to India contravenes the very spirit of UNFCCC?

Show Hint

Read the sentence that ends with 'contravenes the very spirit of UNFCCC'.
Updated On: Oct 1, 2026
  • Introducing binding commitments to enforce Global Solar Energy Convention.
  • Introducing binding commitments on rapidly industrialising countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Introducing binding commitments on developed countries to adopt clean coal technologies.
  • Introducing binding commitments to non-use of nuclear technology for developing countries.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Question.
The question asks what India feels goes against the spirit of UNFCCC. The sentence is in the second paragraph.

Step 2: Find the sentence.
The passage says India is wary of discussions about "introducing binding commitments on rapidly industrialising countries (such as Brazil, China and India) to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. India feels this contravenes the very spirit of UNFCCC."

Step 3: Check option 1.
A Global Solar Energy Convention is never mentioned in the passage. So option 1 is wrong.

Step 4: Check option 2.
This repeats the passage sentence. India feels binding cuts on rapidly industrialising countries go against UNFCCC's spirit. So option 2 is correct.

Step 5: Check option 3.
India wants developed countries to carry the main duty, so binding duties on them are not what India objects to. Clean coal is also not linked to this objection. So option 3 is wrong.

Step 6: Check option 4.
Nuclear technology is not mentioned in the passage. So option 4 is wrong.

Final Answer:
India feels that binding emission cuts on rapidly industrialising countries contravene the spirit of UNFCCC. This is option 2.
\[ \boxed{2} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top CUET Ecology & Environment Questions