Statement I suggests that reducing the growth target for the next plan, which is a logical step if the state is not able to achieve current targets due to resource limitations.
Statement II suggests that analyzing the reasons for failure, which is crucial for understanding and addressing the underlying issues.
Statement III suggests that comparing performance with other states, which can provide insights and benchmarking for better planning in the future.
So,
Statement I Reducing the target for the next plan should be a decision based on careful analysis rather than an immediate course of action.
Statement II Studying the reasons for failure and comparing performance with other states (III) are logical and essential steps.
The correct option is (B): Only II and III follow



| Policy/Insurance | Max age of Entry | Tenures possible | Max. age at expiry | Min. sum assured | For life cover of Rs. 10 lakh premium in Rs. (Entry age/coverage period in yrs) | |||
| \((\frac{30}{25})\) | \((\frac{40}{20})\) | \((\frac{5}{10})\) | \((\frac{55}{10})\) | |||||
| ICICI Prudential | 50 | 5 to 25 yrs. | 65 | Rs. 1 lakh | 3043 | 5110 | 8197 | N.A. |
| HDFC Standard Life | 60 | 5 to 30 yrs | 65 | Rs. 1 lakh | 3050 | 5110 | 8320 | 12600 |
| Max New York Life | 55 | 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 yrs. | 60 | Rs. 2.5 lakh | 3220 | 5650 | 10000 | 12150 |
| Birla Sun Life | 55 | 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 yrs. | 70 | Rs. 2 lakh | 3160 | 5150 | 8790 | 13100 |
| LIC Anmol Jeevan | 50 | 5 to 25 yrs. | 60 | Rs. 5 lakh | 3860 | 7010 | 11450 | N.A. |


