Statement (iii) says:
John participated in Skiing but not in Rock Climbing, and not in Paragliding.
If now John is participating in Paragliding, then this contradicts the earlier info.
So we now temporarily assume (hypothetically) that John is in PG, and see what follows.
From (vi): Mike participated in exactly one of Skiing and Paragliding.
If John is in PG, and we know Lewis is not in PG (from iii), then among John and Lewis, PG is partially filled.
Since only two people can be in PG (PG = 2x = 2), the other must be Mike.
Therefore, Mike is in PG.
But this contradicts (vi), which said Mike is in only one of Skiing and PG.
So Mike is not in PG \(\Rightarrow\) Mike must be in Skiing.
Then Peter must be the other person in PG (to fulfill PG = 2 people).
Now: Mike is in Skiing, not in PG.
So Mike must be in Rock Climbing (to fulfill event participation constraint), because he must do at least one sport and not both PG and Skiing.
But he already did Skiing, so he must not do PG \(\Rightarrow\) Rock Climbing is the only other event.
So (A) Mike participated in Rock Climbing is necessarily true.
\[
\Rightarrow \boxed{\text{A}}
\]