Clarifying ecological relationships. Mutualism describes interactions where both species benefit. In parasitism, one species benefits at the cost of the other, which is harmed (not unbenefitted as implied). Competition generally results in harm to both species due to resource scarcity, and commensalism benefits one without affecting the other.
Therefore, the statement about parasitism is incorrect as it mischaracterizes the relationship.
To solve this problem, we need to identify the incorrect statement related to various ecological interactions between species.
1. Understanding the Types of Interactions:
Let's evaluate the different types of ecological interactions mentioned in the options:
2. Conclusion:
The incorrect statement is "Both species are not benefitted in parasitism," as parasitism benefits one species at the cost of the other.
Final Answer:
The correct answer is Option B: "Both species are not benefitted in parasitism."
Match the following types of bones with examples:

Study the following and pick up the incorrect statements:
I. In commensalism both partners are benefitted due to each other.
II. In amensalism no partner is benefitted.
III. In parasitism, one partner is benefitted and the other is harmed.
IV. In competition both the partners are benefitted.