Reasoning from definitions:
Potential output is the maximum achievable with full and efficient use of resources; actual output is what is really produced given current utilization. If resources are used inefficiently or left idle, some of the potential is wasted, so actual output falls below potential output, not the reverse as Statement (I) claims, making it false. Turning to the production possibility curve (PPC), it is drawn by plotting every efficient combination of two goods obtainable from fully and efficiently employed resources, points on the curve represent maximum, not minimum, output combinations; points inside the curve represent underutilization instead. So describing the PPC as showing "minimum possible output" inverts its actual meaning, making Statement (II) false as well. With both statements misrepresenting the potential/actual and maximum/minimum relationships, option (2) is correct.