Question

Given below are two statements:
one is labelled as
Assertion (A) and the other is labelled as
Reason (R).
Assertion (A):
'Tat Tvam Asi' was a dialogue between Uddalaka and his son Svetaketu.
Reason (R):
Anguttara Nikaya gives a list of sixteen great kingdoms called 'sixteen Mahajanapada'.

• A. Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
• B. Both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
• C. (A) is correct but (R) is not correct
• D. (A) is not correct but (R) is correct

Hint:

When dealing with such questions, ensure you understand the context and content of each statement separately before determining their relationship.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is B

Step 1: Concept
The concept here involves understanding the historical context of philosophical dialogues in ancient India, specifically focusing on the dialogue between Uddalaka and his son Svetaketu, as well as the list of sixteen great kingdoms mentioned in the Anguttara Nikaya.

Step 2: Meaning
Assertion (A) refers to a famous dialogue from the Upanishads where 'Tat Tvam Asi' is spoken. This phrase means "That thou art" and is central to understanding the concept of Brahman or ultimate reality in Hindu philosophy. The dialogue takes place between Uddalaka, an ancient sage, and his son Svetaketu. Reason (R) refers to a list found in the Anguttara Nikaya, which is part of the Pali Canon of Theravada Buddhism. This text provides a historical context by listing sixteen great kingdoms that existed during the time of the Buddha.

Step 3: Analysis
Assertion (A) is correct as 'Tat Tvam Asi' is indeed a dialogue between Uddalaka and his son Svetaketu, found in the Chandogya Upanishad. This dialogue is significant in understanding the concept of Brahman and Atman in Hindu philosophy. Reason (R), however, does not directly explain or relate to Assertion (A). The list of sixteen Mahajanapada mentioned in the Anguttara Nikaya pertains to a different historical context and philosophical tradition, specifically Buddhism. Therefore, Reason (R) is correct but it is not the explanation for Assertion (A).

Step 4: Conclusion
Both statements are individually correct, but Reason (R) does not explain or relate to Assertion (A). Thus, the correct answer is that both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A). Final Answer: (B)