Question

Given below are two statements one is labelled as
Assertion (A) and the other is labelled as
Reason (R).
Assertion (A):
Badauni alleged that muslims were not allowed to get the membership of Din-i-ilahi.
Reason (R):
The list of 18 members shows that all were Hindus.

• A. Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
• B. Both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
• C. (A) is correct but (R) is not correct
• D. (A) is not correct but (R) is correct

Hint:

Understanding historical perspectives and their sources is crucial in analyzing such assertions and reasons.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is C

Step 1: Concept
The Din-i-ilahi was a religious concept proposed by Emperor Akbar in the 16th century. It aimed to combine elements of various religions, including Hinduism and Islam, into one universal religion.

Step 2: Meaning
Badauni was an Islamic scholar who lived during the Mughal era. He criticized certain aspects of Akbar's policies, including the Din-i-ilahi.

Step 3: Analysis
Assertion (A) states that Badauni alleged Muslims were not allowed to get the membership of Din-i-ilahi. This can be true because Badauni was known for his critical stance towards Akbar’s religious reforms and might have accused Muslims of being excluded from such a program, which he perceived as favoring Hindus. Reason (R) states that the list of 18 members shows all were Hindus. This is also historically accurate based on available records, suggesting that Badauni's allegation had some basis in fact or perception. However, Reason (R) does not directly explain Assertion (A). The assertion is more about Badauni’s claim and his perspective rather than a factual statement of the membership list.

Step 4: Conclusion
While both statements can be considered correct, Reason (R) does not serve as an explanation for Assertion (A). Final Answer: (C)