This question involves operator precedence and pointer arithmetic in C.
1. Analyzing Assertion (A):
In the expression ++*ptr, we have the prefix increment operator (++) and the indirection operator (*). Both are unary operators that have the same precedence and associate from right to left.
• First, *ptr is evaluated to fetch the value at the memory address.
• Second, the ++ operator increments that fetched value.
As the value is incremented, Assertion (A) is correct.
2. Analyzing Reason (R):
The statement "ptr is a pointer" is a factual requirement; without ptr being a pointer, the * operator could not be used. Thus, Reason (R) is correct.
3. Evaluating the Linkage:
While ptr must be a pointer for the expression to be valid, being a pointer is not the reason why the value is incremented instead of the address. The behavior is determined by operator precedence and associativity rules. For example, *ptr++ would increment the pointer address instead. Therefore, (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).