1st/2nd Person $>$ 3rd Person $>$ Proper Name $>$ Human Noun
3rd Person $>$ 1st/2nd Person Person $>$ Proper Name $>$ Human Noun
3rd Person $>$ 1st/2nd Person $>$ Human Noun $>$ Proper Name
1st/2nd Person $>$ 3rd Person $>$ Human Noun $>$ Proper Name
Step 1: Understanding animacy hierarchy.
In linguistics, the animacy hierarchy organizes noun phrases according to their degree of animacy or salience in communication. More animate entities (like speech participants) rank higher than less animate ones (like common nouns).
Step 2: General principle.
The well-established hierarchy is:
\[ 1st/2nd Person > 3rd Person > \; > \; Proper Names \; > \; Human Nouns \; > \; Non-Human Animates \; > \; Inanimates \]
Step 3: Apply to options.
- Option (A) exactly matches the standard hierarchy (at least up to Human Noun).
- Option (B) wrongly places 3rd person above 1st/2nd Person
- Option (C) misorders Human Noun and Proper Name.
- Option (D) misorders Human Noun and Proper Name.
Thus, the correct order is given in Option (A).
\[ \boxed{\text{1st/2nd Person $>$ 3rd person $>$ Proper Name $>$ Human Noun}} \]
Consider the following two statements, S1 and S2 and choose the correct option.
S1: If X is an adjunct of Y, then Y is an argument of X because the presence of Y in a sentence is necessary for X to occur.
S2: It is not necessarily true that if Y is an argument of X, then X is Y's adjunct.
Given the sentences S1 and S2, choose the option that explains why S2 cannot be derived from S1.
S1: Deadpool was interested in Wolverine's description of morphosyntax.
S2: *What was Deadpool interested in Wolverine's description of?