Step 1: Analyze option (C).
The language \( \{ w x w^R \} \) is context-free since a PDA can push symbols of \(w\), ignore \(x\), and then pop to match \(w^R\). Hence, (C) is context-free.
Step 2: Analyze option (D).
The language \( \{ w x x^R w^R \} \) is a concatenation of two palindromic patterns and can be recognized by a PDA using a stack in two phases. Hence, (D) is context-free.
Step 3: Analyze option (B).
The language \( \{ w w^R x x^R \} \) is a concatenation of two palindromes, each of which is context-free, and CFLs are closed under concatenation. Hence, (B) is context-free.
Step 4: Eliminate option (A).
The language \( \{ w x w^R x^R \} \) requires simultaneous matching of two independent strings in cross order, which is not possible with a single stack PDA. Hence, (A) is not context-free.
In a pushdown automaton \( P = (Q, \Sigma, \Gamma, \delta, q_0, F) \), a transition of the form

where \( p, q \in Q \), \( a \in \Sigma \cup \{\epsilon\} \), and \( X, Y \in \Gamma \cup \{\epsilon\} \), represents \[ (q, Y) \in \delta(p, a, X). \] Consider the following pushdown automaton over the input alphabet \( \Sigma = \{a, b\} \) and stack alphabet \( \Gamma = \{\#, A\} \):

The number of strings of length 100 accepted by the above pushdown automaton is \(\underline{\hspace{2cm}}\).