Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks for the necessary legal characteristics of valid "consent" when used as a defense (under the maxim *volenti non fit injuria*) to avoid liability in tort law.
Step 2: Key Principles and Statutory Provisions:
The defense of Volenti non fit injuria (to a willing person, no injury is done) requires the defendant to prove that the plaintiff voluntarily and knowingly consented to run the risk of harm.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation and Analysis:
• For consent to serve as a complete defense in a tort claim, it must meet several strict legal standards:
• Free (A): The consent must be given voluntarily, without any physical coercion, undue influence, or psychological pressure.
Consent given under duress is not legally valid.
• Informed (B): The plaintiff must have full knowledge and understanding of the nature and extent of the risk they are consenting to.
"Scienti non fit injuria" (mere knowledge of a risk) is not the same as consent, but consent cannot exist without knowledge.
• Not Vitiated (C): The consent must not be obtained through fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
If the consent is obtained by misrepresenting the facts, it is vitiated and void.
Step 4: Final Answer:
Since a valid consent must be free, informed, and not vitiated, the correct option is (D).