Question:

For a consent to be valid, to avoid liability, it must be

Show Hint

Consent to a risk must be voluntary.
In employment relationships, courts are reluctant to find consent because an employee might accept a dangerous task out of fear of losing their job (the "rescue cases" and "master-servant" exceptions).
Updated On: Jul 7, 2026
  • free
  • informed
  • not vitiated
  • all of the above
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks for the necessary legal characteristics of valid "consent" when used as a defense (under the maxim *volenti non fit injuria*) to avoid liability in tort law.

Step 2: Key Principles and Statutory Provisions:

The defense of Volenti non fit injuria (to a willing person, no injury is done) requires the defendant to prove that the plaintiff voluntarily and knowingly consented to run the risk of harm.

Step 3: Detailed Explanation and Analysis:


• For consent to serve as a complete defense in a tort claim, it must meet several strict legal standards:

Free (A): The consent must be given voluntarily, without any physical coercion, undue influence, or psychological pressure.
Consent given under duress is not legally valid.

Informed (B): The plaintiff must have full knowledge and understanding of the nature and extent of the risk they are consenting to.
"Scienti non fit injuria" (mere knowledge of a risk) is not the same as consent, but consent cannot exist without knowledge.

Not Vitiated (C): The consent must not be obtained through fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
If the consent is obtained by misrepresenting the facts, it is vitiated and void.

Step 4: Final Answer:

Since a valid consent must be free, informed, and not vitiated, the correct option is (D).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0