Step 1: Read the graph:
Each point is one company. The horizontal axis is turnover and the vertical axis is profit. Reading the points as (turnover, profit), with values accurate to the nearest few units:
Textile: (750, 120), (1770, 210), (2810, 110), (3770, 220). Cement: (2210, 275), (2210, 170), (2610, 360), (3260, 150). Steel: (1260, 225), (1260, 175), (2270, 120), (2610, 320), (3410, 275).
That is 13 companies in all (4 textile, 4 cement, 5 steel).
Step 2: What we test:
A company has profit above 10% of turnover when profit is more than one tenth of its turnover. So for every point we find \(0.1 \times \text{turnover}\) and compare it with the profit.
Step 3: Textile companies:
(750, 120): 10% of 750 is 75 and 120 is more. Yes.
(1770, 210): 10% of 1770 is 177 and 210 is more. Yes.
(2810, 110): 10% of 2810 is 281 and 110 is less. No.
(3770, 220): 10% of 3770 is 377 and 220 is less. No.
Textile gives 2.
Step 4: Cement companies:
(2210, 275): 10% is 221 and 275 is more. Yes.
(2210, 170): 10% is 221 and 170 is less. No.
(2610, 360): 10% is 261 and 360 is more. Yes.
(3260, 150): 10% is 326 and 150 is less. No.
Cement gives 2.
Step 5: Steel companies:
(1260, 225): 10% is 126 and 225 is more. Yes.
(1260, 175): 10% is 126 and 175 is more. Yes.
(2270, 120): 10% is 227 and 120 is less. No.
(2610, 320): 10% is 261 and 320 is more. Yes.
(3410, 275): 10% is 341 and 275 is less. No.
Steel gives 3.
Step 6: Add up:
\[ 2 + 2 + 3 = 7 \]
Option (1), 8, would need one more company above the line, but every left-out point is far below it (for example the cement point at (3260, 150) needs 326). Options (3) and (4), 6 and 5, drop points that are clearly above the 10% mark, such as the steel point at (1260, 175).
Final Answer:
Seven companies have profit above 10% of turnover, which is option (2).
\[ \boxed{\text{Option (2): 7}} \]