Step 1: Define Batesian mimicry.
A palatable/harmless species (the mimic) evolves to resemble an unpalatable/toxic model species. Predators that have learned (or evolved) to avoid the model also avoid the mimic \Rightarrow the mimic gains anti-predator protection.
Step 2: Identify the key benefit to the mimic.
Protection is achieved without paying the biochemical/physiological costs of producing toxins or other defenses. Hence option (C) captures the benefit exactly.
Step 3: Eliminate distractors.
(A) Wrong: the mimic \emph{does not} become more toxic; it only \emph{looks} like a toxic model.
(B) Irrelevant: “cooperation” is not central to mimicry.
(D) Not a standard or causal benefit; mimicry targets predation risk, not interspecific resource competition.
Final Answer:
\[
\boxed{\text{(C) Increased protection without investing in toxicity}}
\]