Question:

Crossroads, a wellness centre allows a member to spend a maximum of one hour in a meditation hall. Shailaja has been in a meditation hall for at least one and a half hours. Which of the following is a valid conclusion if only the above information is used?

Show Hint

Logical conclusions must follow strict propositional rules (if/then) rather than general assumptions.
Updated On: Jun 12, 2026
  • She will not be allowed entry the next time
  • Shailaja is not meditating in the meditating hall at Crossroads
  • The meditation hall is not spacious
  • If Shailaja is not violating the wellness centre rule, she is not meditating at Crossroads
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This is an application of formal logic, specifically the contrapositive of a conditional statement.

Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
1. Let \( P \) be "Shailaja is meditating at Crossroads" and \( Q \) be "Violating the rule".
2. The rule implies: If \( P \), then time \( \le 1 \) hour.
3. If the violation (\( Q \)) is False (not violating), then the condition for meditating (\( P \)) must be False.

Step 3: Final Answer:
Option (D) is the valid logical conclusion.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top NIMCET Logical Reasoning Questions

View More Questions

Top NIMCET Logical Deduction Questions

View More Questions