Given base facts:
Check Statement I alone:
“Exactly two scored less than Cheryl.”
Then precisely two people are below Cheryl. - Possible bottom two: \(\{ \text{Danish}, \text{Feroze} \}\) or \(\{ \text{Danish}, \text{Biplove} \}\). - Order between them is not uniquely determined. - Emily is not lowest, and Biplove \(>\) Danish can still hold (e.g., Biplove second-lowest, Danish lowest).
\(\Rightarrow\) The lowest is **not uniquely determined** by Statement I. (Insufficient.)
Check Statement II alone:
“Emily and Feroze scored the same.”
- Emily is not the lowest \(\Rightarrow\) Feroze (with equal score) is also not the lowest. - Cheryl is above at least two people, and the pair below Cheryl cannot include Emily or Feroze. - With Biplove \(>\) Danish, the **only possible candidate** for the lowest is Danish.
\(\Rightarrow\) Statement II alone is sufficient.
Final Answer: \[ \boxed{\text{B (Statement II only is sufficient).}} \]
| \(3x+4y\) | \(2x\) | \(2x+y+z\) |
| \(2x^2\) | \(4y\) | \(y^2+z\) |
| \(y+z\) | \(3x+2z\) | \(z-1\) |
From a group of 545 contenders, a party has to select a leader. Even after holding a series of meetings, the politicians and the general body failed to reach a consensus. It was then proposed that all 545 contenders be given a number from 1 to 545. Then they will be asked to stand on a podium in a circular arrangement, and counting would start from the contender numbered 1. The counting would be done in a clockwise fashion. The rule is that every alternate contender would be asked to step down as the counting continued, with the circle getting smaller and smaller, till only one person remains standing. Therefore the rst person to be eliminated would be the contender numbered 2.