


Let \( a, b, c, d \) be the weights of parameters Faculty (F), Research (R), Placements (P), and Infrastructure (I) respectively.
Given inequalities:
From these, we derive:
This implies the order: \( b > d > c \)
The weights \( a, b, c, d \) are from the set \( \{0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4\} \).
Let’s consider possibilities. From \( b > d > c \), \( b = 0.4 \), \( d = 0.3 \), and \( c = 0.2 \). The remaining value \( a = 0.1 \).
Now check inequality (i):
\[ 2d = 0.6 > a + b = 0.1 + 0.4 = 0.5 \quad \text{✓} \]
Hence, the correct assignment is:
Answer: Weight of Faculty parameter (a) is 0.1
Let \( a, b, c, d \) be the weights of parameters F, R, P, and I respectively.
Given inequalities:
From the above, we deduce:
This gives us the ranking: \( b > d > c \)
The weights \( a, b, c, d \) are all from the set \( \{0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4\} \).
If \( d = 0.1 \) or \( 0.2 \), then \( 2d \) cannot be greater than \( a + b \). So the only valid values for \( d \) are 0.3 or 0.4. But since \( b > d \), we must have:
Now, using inequality (i):
\[ 2d > a + b \Rightarrow 0.6 > a + 0.4 \Rightarrow a < 0.2 \Rightarrow a = 0.1 \]
Remaining weight: \( c = 0.2 \)
Final weights:
According to the weighted scoring system, the number of colleges that received an AAA rating (presumably above a certain threshold score) is:
Answer: 3
What is the highest overall score among the eight colleges?
Let \( a, b, c, d \) be the weights of parameters F, R, P, and I respectively.
Given constraints:
From these equations:
This implies the following weight ranking: \[ b > d > c \]
Weights are one of: \( \{0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4\} \).
If \( d = 0.1 \) or \( d = 0.2 \), then \( 2d \) cannot exceed \( a + b \) unless both \( a \) and \( b \) are very small, which is not possible. So: \[ d = 0.3 \text{ or } 0.4 \] But since \( b > d \), we must have: \[ b = 0.4, \quad d = 0.3 \] Using inequality (i): \[ 2d > a + b \Rightarrow 0.6 > a + 0.4 \Rightarrow a < 0.2 \Rightarrow a = 0.1 \] Remaining weight is: \[ c = 0.2 \]
Final assigned weights:
Using these weights, the maximum weighted score among the eight colleges turns out to be:
Answer: 48
The correct answer is (C):
Let \( a, b, c, d \) be the weights of parameters F, R, P, and I respectively.
Given inequalities:
Simplifying the inequalities:
So, the relative order of weights is: \[ b > d > c \quad \text{and from (i)} \quad 2d > a + b \]
Given possible weights: \( 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 \) in some order.
Now, eliminate inconsistent combinations:
Thus:
From inequality (i): \( 2d > a + b \Rightarrow 0.6 > a + 0.4 \Rightarrow a < 0.2 \Rightarrow a = 0.1 \)
Remaining weight: \( c = 0.2 \)
Final weights:
Final Insight:
No college has a total score between 31 and 40 (inclusive), based on these weight combinations and the scoring data (assumed from context).
Answer: 0
The table provided displays the estimated cost (in lakh) for the construction of a canal between two points. Based on the information in the table, answer the questions that follow.
The following table gives the marks obtained by six students in six different subjects in an examination. The maximum marks for each subject are given in the brackets. Answer the questions that follow.
Consider the provided scenario and answer the following questions based on the given information.

