Question:

All had betrayed him in his hour of need, but there he was, full of hope that the truth will prevail. 

Show Hint

Use yet when introducing a contrast between two clauses, as it shows a shift in the situation or idea.

Updated On: Jul 16, 2026
  • still, he was there, full of hope
  • although, he was there, full of hope
  • yet, there he was, full of hope
  • and there he was, full of hope 

Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Approach Solution - 1


The sentence contrasts the betrayal of the subject with the display of hope. The word yet is the most fitting conjunction to show this contrast. - Option (A) still doesn't create a strong enough contrast between the betrayal and the hope. - Option (B) although does not fit well with the structure here and disrupts the flow of the sentence. - Option (C) yet effectively introduces a contrasting idea and fits the tone of the sentence. - Option (D) and simply connects the two parts but does not highlight the contrast adequately. Thus, Option (C) is the best choice.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

Since the original sentence keeps the exact word order "there he was" after the connector, checking whether each option preserves this structure while supplying a suitable contrastive connector narrows down the choice quickly.

  1. Option A: "still, he was there" reverses the original subject-verb order to "he was there" instead of "there he was," breaking the sentence's original inverted structure, even though "still" does suggest continuity.
  2. Option B: "although, he was there" both changes the word order and uses "although" awkwardly as a standalone connector in this position, which does not read naturally.
  3. Option C: "yet, there he was" keeps the exact original inversion "there he was" and pairs it with "yet," a connector that cleanly signals contrast with the earlier betrayal, fitting both structure and meaning.
  4. Option D: "and there he was" preserves the word order but "and" is a neutral connector that fails to signal the contrast between betrayal and hope that the sentence requires.

Only option C matches the original inverted word order and supplies a connector that correctly signals contrast.

Hence, the correct answer is Option C.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top SNAP English Questions

View More Questions