Step 1: Recall the definition of PPV. The positive predictive value is the probability that a person who tests positive truly has the disease. It uses only those who tested positive:
\[ PPV = \frac{\text{True Positives}}{\text{True Positives} + \text{False Positives}} \]
Step 2: Identify the numbers. True positives (TP) = 90 and false positives (FP) = 50, so the total number testing positive = 90 + 50 = 140.
Step 3: Substitute.
\[ PPV = \frac{90}{140} = 0.643 = 64.3\% \]
Step 4: Interpret. About 64% of those flagged positive by the test actually have the disease; the remaining ~36% are false alarms.
Step 5: Why the others are wrong. 90% wrongly treats all 90 TP as the whole positive group. 50% has no valid derivation. 35.7% is the complement (50/140), i.e. the false-positive proportion among positives, not the PPV.
Key fact: PPV = TP / (TP + FP) = 90/140 ≈ 64.3%.