A cylindrical workpiece is turned using two different tools. Tool 1 has zero nose radius; the side and end cutting edge angles are \(20^\circ\) and \(10^\circ\), respectively. Tool 2 has a 0.5 mm nose radius. Both tools machine at a feed of \(0.2\ \text{mm/rev}\). The ratio of the ideal maximum height of unevenness on the surface produced by Tool 1 to that produced by Tool 2 is \(\underline{\hspace{2cm}}\) (round off to one decimal place).
Step 1: Maximum height of unevenness for Tool 1 (sharp tool).
For a sharp tool (zero nose radius) with side cutting edge angle \(C_s\) and end cutting edge angle \(C_e\), the theoretical peak-to-valley surface roughness is
\[
h_1 \;=\; \frac{f}{\tan C_s + \cot C_e},
\]
where \(f\) is the feed per revolution.
Here,
\[
C_s = 20^\circ, C_e = 10^\circ, f = 0.2\ \text{mm/rev}.
\]
So,
\[
h_1 = \frac{0.2}{\tan 20^\circ + \cot 10^\circ}.
\]
Numerically,
\[
\tan 20^\circ \approx 0.3640, \cot 10^\circ = \frac{1}{\tan 10^\circ} \approx 5.6713,
\]
\[
\tan 20^\circ + \cot 10^\circ \approx 0.3640 + 5.6713 = 6.0353,
\]
\[
h_1 \approx \frac{0.2}{6.0353} \approx 0.0331\ \text{mm}.
\]
Step 2: Maximum height of unevenness for Tool 2 (with nose radius).
For a tool with nose radius \(r\), the theoretical peak-to-valley roughness is
\[
h_2 = \frac{f^2}{8r}.
\]
With \(f = 0.2\ \text{mm/rev}\) and \(r = 0.5\ \text{mm}\):
\[
h_2 = \frac{(0.2)^2}{8 \times 0.5} = \frac{0.04}{4} = 0.01\ \text{mm}.
\]
Step 3: Ratio of maximum heights (Tool 1 / Tool 2).
\[
\frac{h_1}{h_2} = \frac{0.0331}{0.01} \approx 3.31.
\]
Rounded off to one decimal place,
\[
\frac{h_1}{h_2} \approx 3.3.
\]
Final Answer: \(3.3\)



