Concept:
- The Negation Test is the standard way to verify a necessary assumption: negate the statement, and if the conclusion of the argument falls apart when the negated statement is true, the original statement was a required assumption.
- A statement that is already given as a stated fact in the argument, or that adds new information beyond what the conclusion actually needs, is not the answer, even if it sounds plausible.
Step 1: Identify the conclusion to protect.
The conclusion is that the stadium will produce a net benefit for the local community.
Step 2: Negate option (A): "the stadium will not create jobs."
Job creation is already stated as a given premise in the argument, so negating a premise does not reveal a hidden assumption. Option (A) is not the answer.
Step 3: Negate option (B): "there is no recession."
The argument never claims a recession is happening, so this negation has no effect on the conclusion at all. Option (B) is not the answer.
Step 4: Negate option (D): "residents will not have more disposable income."
The claimed increase in spending could still come from outside tourists rather than residents specifically, so the conclusion survives this negation. Option (D) is not the answer.
Step 5: Negate option (E): "the stadium will not be the primary factor in growth."
The argument only claims the stadium contributes to growth, never that it is the sole or primary cause, so the conclusion survives. Option (E) is not the answer.
Step 6: Negate option (C): "the stadium will harm existing local businesses."
If true, any jobs or spending gained at the stadium could simply be offset by losses at existing businesses, so the claimed net community benefit collapses under this negation. Option (C) is the required assumption.
Final Answer: The new stadium will not harm the existing local businesses (Option C)