Question:

60-year old male with RA on MTX for 5 years presents with SOB and cough. Chest examination reveals end-inspiratory crackles. HRCT shows reticular opacities and traction bronchiectasis (UIP pattern). Which of the following is correct?

Show Hint

Remember that the UIP pattern in RA-ILD carries a worse prognosis compared to the NSIP pattern. While MTX can cause hypersensitivity pneumonitis, patients with RA-ILD should not automatically have their MTX discontinued unless acute MTX toxicity is definitively suspected, as RA-ILD is generally a manifestation of the disease itself.
Updated On: Sep 3, 2026
  • Methotrexate induced fibrosis is very common
  • Honey combing on CT is suggestive of irreversible damage
  • End inspiratory coarse crepitations are a typical finding
  • This condition is likely to respond well to steroids
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Concept:
This question tests the understanding of Rheumatoid Arthritis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease (RA-ILD) and its differentiation from drug-induced lung injury.
The patient presents with progressive respiratory symptoms and High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) findings consistent with a Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) pattern, which is the most common radiographic and histologic pattern in RA-ILD.
Explanation:

• Rheumatoid arthritis frequently involves the lungs, with ILD being a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. The UIP pattern is characterized by subpleural, basal-predominant reticular opacities, traction bronchiectasis, and honeycombing.

• Option (A) is incorrect. Methotrexate (MTX) pneumonitis is a known but rare complication (hypersensitivity reaction), usually occurring early in the course of treatment, not as a chronic progressive fibrotic UIP pattern after 5 years. Chronic fibrosis is primarily driven by the underlying RA, not the MTX.

• Option (B) is correct. Honeycombing on an HRCT represents end-stage destruction of alveolar architecture and cystic spaces lined by bronchiolar epithelium. It is the hallmark of established, irreversible fibrosis.

• Option (C) is incorrect. The characteristic physical examination finding in fibrotic ILD (especially UIP) is fine, "Velcro-like" end-inspiratory crackles, not coarse crepitations (which are more typical of airway secretions or bronchiectasis alone).

• Option (D) is incorrect. The UIP pattern in RA-ILD (and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis) is notoriously resistant to corticosteroid therapy. Steroids are minimally effective for established fibrosis and may carry high side-effect profiles without altering the disease course. Antifibrotics (like Nintedanib) or specific immunosuppressants are preferred.
Final answer:
The presence of honeycombing indicates severe structural lung damage and irreversible fibrosis, making (B) the correct statement.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top NEET SS Medical Questions

View More Questions

Top NEET SS Rheumatology Questions

View More Questions

Top NEET SS Questions

View More Questions