List of top Data Interpretation & Logical Reasoning (DILR) Questions

Mathematicians are assigned a number called Erdős number (named after the famous mathematician, Paul Erdős). Only Paul Erdős himself has an Erdős number of \(0\). Any mathematician who has written a research paper with Erdős has an Erdős number of \(1\). For other mathematicians, the calculation of his/her Erdős number is as follows:

Suppose a mathematician \(X\) has co-authored papers with several other mathematicians. From among them, mathematician \(Y\) has the smallest Erdős number. Let the Erdős number of \(Y\) be \(y\). Then \(X\) has an Erdős number of \(y + 1\). Hence, any mathematician with no co-authorship chain connected to Erdős has an Erdős number of \(\infty\).

In a seven-day long mini-conference organized in memory of Paul Erdős, a close group of eight mathematicians, call them \(A, B, C, D, E, F, G,\) and \(H\), discussed some research problems. At the beginning of the conference:

  • \(A\) was the only participant with an Erdős number of \(\infty\).
  • Nobody had an Erdős number less than that of \(F\).

Event Timeline

Day 3 Event:

  • \(F\) co-authored a paper jointly with \(A\) and \(C\).
  • This reduced the average Erdős number of the group of eight mathematicians to \(3\).
  • The Erdős numbers of \(B, D, E, G, H\) remained unchanged.
  • No other co-authorship among any three members would have reduced the average Erdős number of the group to as low as \(3\).

At the end of Day 3:

  • Five members of the group had identical Erdős numbers.
  • The other three had Erdős numbers distinct from each other.

 

Day 5 Event:

  • \(E\) co-authored a paper with \(F\).
  • This reduced the group’s average Erdős number by \(0.5\).
  • The Erdős numbers of the other six members were unchanged.

Note: No other paper was written during the conference.

The year is 2089. Beijing, London, New York, and Paris are in contention to host the 2096 Olympics. The eventual winner is determined through several rounds of voting by members of the IOC with each member representing a different city. All the four cities in contention are also represented in IOC.

RoundTotal Votes CastMaximum Votes CastEliminated
CityNo. of VotesCityNo. of Votes
1London30New York12
283Paris32Beijing21
375
  • In any round of voting, the city receiving the lowest number of votes in that round gets eliminated. The survivor after the last round of voting gets to host the event.
  • A member is allowed to cast votes for at most two different cities in all rounds of voting combined. (Hence, a member becomes ineligible to cast a vote in a given round if both the cities (s)he voted for in earlier rounds are out of contention in that round of voting.)
  • A member is also ineligible to cast a vote in a round if the city (s)he represents is in contention in that round of voting.
  • As long as the member is eligible, (s)he must vote and vote for only one candidate city in any round of voting. The following incomplete table shows the information on cities that received the maximum and minimum votes in different rounds, the number of votes cast in their favour, and the total votes that were cast in those rounds. It is also known that:
  • All those who voted for London and Paris in round 1, continued to vote for the same cities in subsequent rounds as long as these cities were in contention. 75% of those who voted for Beijing in round 1, voted for Beijing in round 2 as well.
  • Those who voted for New York in round 1, voted either for Beijing or Paris in round 2.
  • The difference in votes cast for the two contending cities in the last round was 1.
  • 50% of those who voted for Beijing in round 1, voted for Paris in round 3.

The table below reports the gender, designation and age-group of the employees in an organization. It also provides information on their commitment to projects coming up in the months of January (Jan), February (Feb), March (Mar) and April (Apr), as well as their interest in attending workshops on: Business Opportunities (BO), Communication Skills (CS), and E-Governance (EG).

Serial No.NameGenderDesignationAge-GroupCommitted to Projects DuringInterested in Workshop on
1AnshulMMgrYJan, MarCS, EG
2BushkantMDirIFeb, MarBO, EG
3CharuFMgrIJan, FebBO, CS
4DineshMExeOJan, AprBO, CS, EG
5EashwaranMDirOFeb, AprBO
6FatimaFMgrYJan, MarBO, CS
7GayatriFExeYFeb, MarEG
8HariMMgrIFeb, MarBO, CS, EG
9IndiraFDirOFeb, AprBO, EG
10JohnMDirYJan, MarBO
11KalindiFExeIJan, AprBO, CS, EG
12LavanyaFMgrOFeb, AprCS, EG
13MandeepMMgrOMar, AprBO, EG
14NandlalMDirIJan, FebBO, EG
15ParulFExeYFeb, AprCS, EG
16RahulMMgrYMar, AprCS, EG
17SunitaFDirYJan, FebBO, EG
18UrvashiFExeIFeb, MarEG
19YaminiFMgrOMar, AprCS, EG
20ZeenaFExeYJan, MarBO, CS, EG

M=Male, F= Female; Exe=Executive, Mgr=Manager, Dir=Director; Y=Young, I=In-between, O=Old

For each workshop, exactly four employees are to be sent, of which at least two should be Females and at least one should be Young. No employee can be sent to a workshop in which he/she is not interested in. An employee cannot attend the workshop on

  • Communication Skills, if he/she is committed to internal projects in the month of January;
  • Business Opportunities, if he/she is committed to internal projects in the month of February;
  • E-governance, if he/she is committed to internal projects in the month of March.

ATP Women's Tournament Seeding

In the table below is the listing of players, seeded from highest (#1) to lowest (#32), who are due to play in an Association of Tennis Players (ATP) tournament for women. This tournament has four knockout rounds before the final, i.e., first round, second round, quarterfinals, and semi-finals. In the first round, the highest seeded player plays the lowest seeded player (seed #32) which is designated match No. 1 of first round; the 2nd seeded player plays the 31st seeded player which is designated match No. 2 of the first round, and so on. Thus, for instance, match No. 16 of first round is to be played between 16th seeded player and the 17th seeded player. In the second round, the winner of match No. 1 of first round plays the winner of match No. 16 of first round and is designated match No. 1 of second round. Similarly, the winner of match No. 2 of first round plays the winner of match No. 15 of first round, and is designated match No. 2 of second round. Thus, for instance, match No. 8 of the second round is to be played between the winner of match No. 8 of first round and the winner of match No. 9 of first round. The same pattern is followed for later rounds as well

Seed #Name of PlayerSeed #Name of PlayerSeed #Name of Player
1Maria Sharapova12Mary Pierce23Silvia Farina Elia
2Lindsay Davenport13Anastasia Myskina24Tatiana Golovin
3Amelie Mauresmo14Alicia Molik25Shinobu Asagoe
4Kim Clijsters15Nathalie Dechy26Francesca Schiavone
5Svetlana Kuznetsova16Elena Bovina27Nicole Vaidisova
6Elena Dementieva17Jelena Jankovic28Gisella Dulko
7Justine Henin18Ana Ivanovic29Flavia Pennetta
8Serena Williams19Vera Zvonareva30Anna Chakvetadze
9Nadia Petrova20Elena Likhovtseva31Ai Sugiyama
10Venus Williams21Daniela Hantuchova32Anna-lena Groenefeld
11Patty Schnyder22Dinara Safina