The passage says gendered workplace networks mean men gain greater access to senior leaders, and that this becomes a further difficulty for working women. Each option makes a two-part claim, first about access to senior leaders, then about the effect on career progression, so a correct option has to get both the fact and the logic right.
Option B and Option D both misstate who has easier access, and Option A pairs the right fact with the wrong consequence. Option C is the only option where both the stated fact and its logical consequence match the passage.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option C.
The "motherhood penalty" is described as an assumption about parenting duties that leads people to believe women are less committed to their careers, with effects showing up in hiring, promotions, and wages. The question asks for an outcome of this penalty, so the right option should describe a consequence, specifically a hiring pattern, not just restate the underlying stereotype.
Option A gets the direction wrong, Option C turns an assumption about women into an absolute claim about their actual priorities, and Option D restates the stereotype rather than its effect. Option B is the only option that names an actual hiring outcome in the correct direction.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option B.
The passage says male professors' evaluations stayed consistent across their career, while female professors' evaluations dropped between their 30s and 40s, bottomed out around age 47, and then recovered to match men's by the early 60s. Since the question ties promotions directly to evaluations, we can map the evaluation trend straight onto expected promotion patterns for each option.
Option B introduces an unsupported prediction about the practice being abandoned, Option C flattens out a real difference the passage describes, and Option D swaps the two groups. Option A is the only option that mirrors the evaluation trend correctly for both groups.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option A.
The passage cites a 2008 study finding that pregnant women were described in positive terms, while menopausal women were linked to negative emotions, illness, and ageing. A "most likely to disagree with" question is really asking for the option that runs opposite to what the passage supports, so the fastest check is to compare the polarity of each option against that finding.
Options A and C are simply not addressed by the passage, and Option B is something the passage's evidence actually supports. Option D is the one option that directly reverses the passage's central finding about how menopausal women are perceived.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option D.
The main argument rests on specific studies showing negative perceptions of women as they age at work. A strengthen question needs an option that adds independent support for that conclusion, ideally by showing the finding holds up beyond the original studies. Let's test each option.
Options A, C, and D all work against the argument, either by contradicting it, discrediting the evidence, or questioning its reliability. Option B is the only option that adds new, independent evidence pointing in the same direction as the author's claim.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option B.
Laura Kray's claim is that women professors may benefit from being seen as "grandmotherly" once they pass their late 40s. A weaken option needs to show that this "grandmotherly" perception is not actually a benefit, particularly in a professional sense. Let's check each option.
Options A, B, and D all describe forms of social or professional benefit, which is exactly what Kray's argument predicts. Option C is the only option that reframes "grandmotherly" as a professional liability rather than an advantage, which is what actually weakens her claim.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option C.