For dot-pattern matrix problems:
\begin{itemize}
\item Track both total counts and quadrant positions,
\item Compare changes step-by-step across examples,
\item Eliminate options that break consistency.
\end{itemize}
Step 1: Observe that each figure is a \(2 \times 2\) grid with dots placed in each quadrant.
\bigskip
Step 2: Compare the given grids from left to right. The pattern shows that:
\begin{itemize}
\item The total number of dots increases in a systematic way,
\item The distribution of dots across the four quadrants follows a consistent rearrangement rule,
\item Corresponding quadrants across successive figures change in a predictable manner.
\end{itemize}
\bigskip
Step 3: Using the two completed examples on the right as references, infer the missing grid such that:
\begin{itemize}
\item The dot count in each quadrant aligns with the progression,
\item The overall balance and symmetry of dots matches the sequence.
\end{itemize}
\bigskip
Step 4: Checking all options:
\begin{itemize}
\item Options A, B, D: Violate either the dot-count progression or quadrant-wise distribution.
\item C: Satisfies both the numerical progression and positional pattern — correct.
\end{itemize}
\bigskip
Final Answer:
\[
\boxed{C}
\]
\bigskip
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top CEED Observation and design sensitivity Questions
