Comprehension
Vidya, a Bachelor of Commerce graduate, secured admission to one of India’s premier business schools (B schools) called Best-Known School of Management (BKSM). Not long after her joining BKSM, she was struck by the calibre of her experienced peers. This, in turn, made her anxious about her placement. Hence, she reached out to one of her seniors, who had also joined BKSM as a fresher, for advice.
In conversations with the senior, Vidya learned that fresher were often advised to join student committees to strengthen their curriculum vitae (CVs) for placements. Confident of making it to one, she started preparing. Despite her confidence, she could not secure a spot in the prominent committees she aspired to join.
Frustrated and angry, Vidya began believing that committee selections were biased. Since the processes were entirely student-run, with minimal administrative oversight, she felt that she had no avenue to raise her concerns. Anjali, Vidya’s roommate in BKSM, told her about Why MBA, a social media platform where students often voiced their grievances anonymously.
Impulsively, Vidya secretly recorded her next committee interview. The interview turned out to be particularly harsh. Now, she was even more determined to post the transcript of the interview on Why MBA to teach a lesson to her seniors.
In conversations with the senior, Vidya learned that fresher were often advised to join student committees to strengthen their curriculum vitae (CVs) for placements. Confident of making it to one, she started preparing. Despite her confidence, she could not secure a spot in the prominent committees she aspired to join.
Frustrated and angry, Vidya began believing that committee selections were biased. Since the processes were entirely student-run, with minimal administrative oversight, she felt that she had no avenue to raise her concerns. Anjali, Vidya’s roommate in BKSM, told her about Why MBA, a social media platform where students often voiced their grievances anonymously.
Impulsively, Vidya secretly recorded her next committee interview. The interview turned out to be particularly harsh. Now, she was even more determined to post the transcript of the interview on Why MBA to teach a lesson to her seniors.
Question: 1
Which of the following considerations will BEST stop her from sharing the transcript on Why MBA?
Which of the following considerations will BEST stop her from sharing the transcript on Why MBA?
Show Hint
Before taking any action that might affect others' reputations, it’s important to consider the long-term consequences, especially when it involves public platforms.
Updated On: Jan 7, 2026
- Few seniors who never made it to committees still secured good placements.
- Sharing such posts on Why MBA may negatively impact the morale of student committee members.
- In recent past, many such posts were shared on Why MBA, but not much changed in committee selection processes.
- Sharing such posts on Why MBA may present the committee selection processes in a bad light.
- Every interview is unique, and it will be easy to guess her identity from the transcript.
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understand the situation.
Vidya, frustrated by her committee rejection, is considering posting a transcript of her interview on a platform to voice her concerns. However, she is weighing the consequences of this action, as it might affect the perception of the committee processes.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- (A) While some seniors who didn’t get into committees still secured placements, this doesn't address the specific reason Vidya might want to post the transcript.
- (B) Sharing the post may indeed negatively impact the morale of other students involved in the process, but this is a secondary concern.
- (C) The fact that previous posts did not affect committee selection is important, but not the most compelling reason for Vidya to hold back.
- (D) This option highlights the key concern: if the committee processes are presented in a bad light, it could harm the reputation of the institution or the processes themselves, which might have larger repercussions.
- (E) While identifying the author of the post could be a concern, it is not the most significant factor compared to the damage to the process's reputation.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The best reason to stop Vidya from posting the transcript is (D), as it focuses on the negative impact it might have on the committee selection processes. This concern outweighs other factors.
Vidya, frustrated by her committee rejection, is considering posting a transcript of her interview on a platform to voice her concerns. However, she is weighing the consequences of this action, as it might affect the perception of the committee processes.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- (A) While some seniors who didn’t get into committees still secured placements, this doesn't address the specific reason Vidya might want to post the transcript.
- (B) Sharing the post may indeed negatively impact the morale of other students involved in the process, but this is a secondary concern.
- (C) The fact that previous posts did not affect committee selection is important, but not the most compelling reason for Vidya to hold back.
- (D) This option highlights the key concern: if the committee processes are presented in a bad light, it could harm the reputation of the institution or the processes themselves, which might have larger repercussions.
- (E) While identifying the author of the post could be a concern, it is not the most significant factor compared to the damage to the process's reputation.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The best reason to stop Vidya from posting the transcript is (D), as it focuses on the negative impact it might have on the committee selection processes. This concern outweighs other factors.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2
Vidya secretly recorded her next committee interview. The very next day, Vidya was selected for the same committee for which she had recorded the interview. However, a few days later, a post went viral on Why MBA about BKSM, accusing the student committees of unfair practices, claiming that seniors selected juniors based on personal preferences rather than objective criteria. The post created a stir in BKSM, making Vidya anxious.
Vidya’s anxiety stemmed from the fact that Anjali, her confidant, knew about Vidya’s intent to publish her interview transcript on Why MBA. Hence, Vidya feared that if Anjali shared Vidya’s earlier intent with anyone at BKSM, her reputation and relationships could be damaged.
What BEST can Vidya do in the current situation so that she is NOT negatively impacted by the viral post?
Vidya secretly recorded her next committee interview. The very next day, Vidya was selected for the same committee for which she had recorded the interview. However, a few days later, a post went viral on Why MBA about BKSM, accusing the student committees of unfair practices, claiming that seniors selected juniors based on personal preferences rather than objective criteria. The post created a stir in BKSM, making Vidya anxious.
Vidya’s anxiety stemmed from the fact that Anjali, her confidant, knew about Vidya’s intent to publish her interview transcript on Why MBA. Hence, Vidya feared that if Anjali shared Vidya’s earlier intent with anyone at BKSM, her reputation and relationships could be damaged.
What BEST can Vidya do in the current situation so that she is NOT negatively impacted by the viral post?
Vidya’s anxiety stemmed from the fact that Anjali, her confidant, knew about Vidya’s intent to publish her interview transcript on Why MBA. Hence, Vidya feared that if Anjali shared Vidya’s earlier intent with anyone at BKSM, her reputation and relationships could be damaged.
What BEST can Vidya do in the current situation so that she is NOT negatively impacted by the viral post?
Show Hint
In situations where there are misunderstandings or false information, it is best to address the issue directly with the concerned parties to clear up any confusion.
Updated On: Jan 7, 2026
- She should not worry about Anjali as Anjali has a limited friend circle.
- She should have a discussion with Anjali and clarify that Vidya had nothing to do with the viral post.
- She should request Why MBA to disclose the name of the person who shared the viral post.
- She should inform the committee that, while Vidya had secretly recorded her interview with them, she had nothing to do with the viral post.
- She should share a post of admiration on Why MBA about the committee that has selected her.
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understand Vidya's dilemma.
Vidya is concerned that her involvement in recording the interview might be misconstrued, especially after the viral post. She is seeking ways to clarify her position.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- (A) Suggesting that Anjali’s limited friend circle will not have an impact is not addressing the core issue of the viral post and its wider ramifications.
- (B) Having a discussion with Anjali might help, but it does not resolve the core problem of the viral post and the damage it might cause.
- (C) Requesting the identity of the person who shared the post may be useful, but it does not solve the problem at hand. It may also increase unnecessary tension.
- (D) This option is the most suitable because it directly addresses the issue with the committee and clarifies that Vidya was not responsible for the viral post.
- (E) Sharing a positive post about the committee might seem insincere or out of place and will not help in clearing up the confusion about the viral post.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The most effective course of action for Vidya is to inform the committee about her intention with the recording and clarify that she had no involvement with the viral post.
Vidya is concerned that her involvement in recording the interview might be misconstrued, especially after the viral post. She is seeking ways to clarify her position.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- (A) Suggesting that Anjali’s limited friend circle will not have an impact is not addressing the core issue of the viral post and its wider ramifications.
- (B) Having a discussion with Anjali might help, but it does not resolve the core problem of the viral post and the damage it might cause.
- (C) Requesting the identity of the person who shared the post may be useful, but it does not solve the problem at hand. It may also increase unnecessary tension.
- (D) This option is the most suitable because it directly addresses the issue with the committee and clarifies that Vidya was not responsible for the viral post.
- (E) Sharing a positive post about the committee might seem insincere or out of place and will not help in clearing up the confusion about the viral post.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The most effective course of action for Vidya is to inform the committee about her intention with the recording and clarify that she had no involvement with the viral post.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3
A few committee secretaries complained to the dean of BKSM about some anonymous posts on Why MBA that they felt were unfairly targeting them. Upon visiting the forums on Why MBA, the dean felt that while most of the posts were innocuous, some indeed crossed the line. Further, she felt that such posts tarnished the image of BKSM. Conversely, she observed that such posts led those targeted to reflect, mend their ways, and become more accountable. She wondered what she could do to save the reputation of BKSM being assailed in public forums through anonymous posts; however, she did not want to do anything disproportionately harsh.
What BEST can the dean do to take a sustainable decision to dissuade students from posting their grievances in public forums, presenting the college in a bad light?
A few committee secretaries complained to the dean of BKSM about some anonymous posts on Why MBA that they felt were unfairly targeting them. Upon visiting the forums on Why MBA, the dean felt that while most of the posts were innocuous, some indeed crossed the line. Further, she felt that such posts tarnished the image of BKSM. Conversely, she observed that such posts led those targeted to reflect, mend their ways, and become more accountable. She wondered what she could do to save the reputation of BKSM being assailed in public forums through anonymous posts; however, she did not want to do anything disproportionately harsh.
What BEST can the dean do to take a sustainable decision to dissuade students from posting their grievances in public forums, presenting the college in a bad light?
What BEST can the dean do to take a sustainable decision to dissuade students from posting their grievances in public forums, presenting the college in a bad light?
Show Hint
Allowing students to voice their grievances anonymously can be an effective way to address issues without compromising the institution’s image.
Updated On: Jan 7, 2026
- Announce that she will run all committee selections personally.
- Create an anonymous in-house forum within BKSM, where the students could discuss anything without consequences.
- Ban access to public forums like Why MBA on the campus.
- Announce that she will run daily open houses to hear student grievances.
- Ask the IT head to run digital surveillance, and catch students posting anything degrading about BKSM in any public forum.
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is B
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understand the dean's concerns.
The dean is aware of the potential harm caused by public posts, but also realizes that some of these posts reflect genuine grievances. Therefore, she wants to ensure that the students can voice their concerns in a more structured and accountable environment.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- (A) Announcing that she will personally oversee all committee selections could be seen as an authoritarian move and might not be practical.
- (B) Creating an anonymous internal forum allows students to express their grievances openly without the fear of repercussions. This could foster constructive feedback and prevent posts that could harm the reputation of BKSM.
- (C) Banning access to public forums like Why MBA might seem extreme and could stifle student voices.
- (D) Announcing daily open houses might be a good idea but could be time-consuming and inefficient for dealing with ongoing issues.
- (E) Implementing digital surveillance might be seen as an invasion of privacy and could exacerbate the problem.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Creating an anonymous in-house forum (Option B) is the best approach, as it allows students to express their concerns while maintaining a sense of accountability.
The dean is aware of the potential harm caused by public posts, but also realizes that some of these posts reflect genuine grievances. Therefore, she wants to ensure that the students can voice their concerns in a more structured and accountable environment.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- (A) Announcing that she will personally oversee all committee selections could be seen as an authoritarian move and might not be practical.
- (B) Creating an anonymous internal forum allows students to express their grievances openly without the fear of repercussions. This could foster constructive feedback and prevent posts that could harm the reputation of BKSM.
- (C) Banning access to public forums like Why MBA might seem extreme and could stifle student voices.
- (D) Announcing daily open houses might be a good idea but could be time-consuming and inefficient for dealing with ongoing issues.
- (E) Implementing digital surveillance might be seen as an invasion of privacy and could exacerbate the problem.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Creating an anonymous in-house forum (Option B) is the best approach, as it allows students to express their concerns while maintaining a sense of accountability.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top XAT Questions
- Ashok, a maths teacher in the school, asked his students to guess his date of birth by giving the following hints.
Hint 1: He was born in 1995
Hint 2: The sum of the products of his birth date multiplied by 24 and his birthday month multiplied by 60 is 1284.
Find the sum of Ashok’s birth date, birth month, and birth year. - Solve for the number of integral values of \(x: \frac{(x^2-15x+47)(x-13)}{(x-8)}<0\).
- In an examination, Akhil scored 11.11% less than the pass marks and Akshay scored 12.5% more than the pass marks. Find the percentage of pass marks if the sum of the scores of Akhil and Akshay is 25% more than the total marks.
- The ratio of paint and oil in Tank A is 3: 4, whereas in Tank B, the respective ratio is 4: 5 . Then, 96 liters of a mixture consisting of paint and oil in the ratio of 5: 1 is added to Tank A, such that the respective ratio in Tank A becomes exactly the reverse of that in Tank B. Find the amount (in liters) of the mixture from Tank B that is poured into Tank A such that the amount of paint and water in Tank A become equal.
- The points (–4, 3) and (–1, –4) are two end points of a diagonal of a parallelogram. If the other diagonal has the equation 7y + 3x + c = 0, then find the value of c.
View More Questions