Comprehension
Until the Keeladi site was discovered, archaeologists by and large believed that the Gangetic plains in the north urbanised significantly earlier than Tamil Nadu. Historians have often claimed that large scale town life in India first developed in the Greater Magadha region of the Gangetic basin. This was during the ‘second urbanisation’ phase. The ‘first urbanisation phase’ refers to the rise of the Harappan or Indus Valley Civilisation. Tamil Nadu was thought to have urbanised at this scale only by the third century BCE. The findings at Keeladi push that date back significantly. … Based on linguistics and continuity in cultural legacies, connections between the Indus Valley Civilisation, or IVC, and old Tamil traditions have long been suggested, but concrete archaeological evidence remained absent. Evidence indicated similarities between graffiti found in Keeladi and symbols associated with the IVC. It bolstered the arguments of dissidents from the dominant North Indian imagination, who have argued for years that their ancestors existed contemporaneously with the IVC. … All the archaeologists I spoke to said it was too soon to make definitive links between the Keeladi site and the IVC. There is no doubt, however, that the discovery at Keeladi has changed the paradigm. In recent years, the results of any new research on early India have invited keen political interest, because proponents of Hindu nationalism support the notion of Vedic culture as fundamental to the origins of Indian civilisation. … The Keeladi excavations further challenge the idea of a single fountainhead of Indian life. They indicate the possibility that the earliest identity that can recognisably be considered ‘Indian’ might not have originated in North India. That wasn’t all. In subsequent seasons of the Keeladi dig, archaeologists discovered that Tamili, a variant of the Brahmi script used for writing inscriptions in the early iterations of the Tamil language, could be dated back to the sixth century BCE, likely a hundred years before previously thought. So not only had urban life thrived in the Tamil lands, but people who lived there had developed their own script. “The evolution of writing is attributed to Ashoka’s edicts, but 2600 years ago writing was prevalent in Keeladi,” Mathan Karuppiah, a proud Madurai local, told me. “A farmer could write his own name on a pot he owned. The fight going on here is ‘You are not the one to teach me to write, I have learnt it myself.’”
[Excerpted from “The Dig”, by Sowmiya Ashok, Fifty-Two]
[Excerpted from “The Dig”, by Sowmiya Ashok, Fifty-Two]
Question: 1
What was the assumption about the origin of urban life in India before the Keeladi dig?
What was the assumption about the origin of urban life in India before the Keeladi dig?
Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
- The origins lay in the northern Gangetic plains, which urbanised earlier than the south.
- The Indus Valley Civilization was the first urban civilization of India.
- The second urbanization was known to be in the Magadha empire.
- Both (A) and (B)
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Approach Solution - 1
The correct option is (A):The origins lay in the northern Gangetic plains, which urbanised earlier than the south.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The question asks what was assumed about the origin of urban life in India before the Keeladi dig. Let's check each option against the passage's opening lines.
- The origins lay in the northern Gangetic plains, which urbanised earlier than the south: This matches the passage's opening statement directly: 'archaeologists by and large believed that the Gangetic plains in the north urbanised significantly earlier than Tamil Nadu.'
- The Indus Valley Civilization was the first urban civilization of India: This is true as a general fact stated in the passage (the 'first urbanisation phase refers to the rise of the... Indus Valley Civilisation'), but it is a definition of terms rather than the specific assumption the Keeladi discovery is shown to challenge, which is about the relative timing of north versus south.
- The second urbanization was known to be in the Magadha empire: This is also stated as background information in the passage, but again it describes a definition of the 'second urbanisation' phase rather than the assumption about north-south timing that Keeladi's findings directly overturn.
- Both (A) and (B): Since the passage frames the challenged assumption specifically around the north urbanising earlier than the south, treating (B) as equally central overstates its role; (A) alone is the assumption the dig is shown to unsettle.
The passage's very first sentence sets up exactly this contrast, framing the north's earlier urbanisation as the belief the Keeladi findings call into question.
Therefore, the correct answer is the origins lay in the northern Gangetic plains, which urbanised earlier than the south.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2
“The Keeladi excavations further challenge the idea of a single fountainhead of Indian life.” — in elaboration of this sentence, which of these options follows?
“The Keeladi excavations further challenge the idea of a single fountainhead of Indian life.” — in elaboration of this sentence, which of these options follows?
Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
- Dominant theories of how urban and modern life came about in ancient India were proved wrong by the Keeladi archaeological dig.
- Neither the Indus Valley Civilization, nor the ancient urban civilization of Magadha are clear explanations of how urban life emerged in the Keeladi region of southern India in the third century BCE.
- The Keeladi archaeological dig proved that Indian urban and modern life emerged independently in several historical periods and geographies, and no one theory is enough to explain it.
- None of the above
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Approach Solution - 1
The correct option is (C):The Keeladi archaeological dig proved that Indian urban and modern life emerged independently in several historical periods and geographies, and no one theory is enough to explain it.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The question asks us to elaborate on the sentence 'The Keeladi excavations further challenge the idea of a single fountainhead of Indian life.' Let's test each option against what 'single fountainhead' means and what the passage actually claims.
- Dominant theories of how urban and modern life came about in ancient India were proved wrong by the Keeladi archaeological dig: This overstates the passage's claim. The passage explicitly quotes archaeologists saying it is 'too soon to make definitive links' between Keeladi and the Indus Valley Civilisation, so nothing has been conclusively 'proved wrong'; the dig has changed the paradigm, not disproved earlier theories outright.
- Neither the Indus Valley Civilization, nor the ancient urban civilization of Magadha are clear explanations of how urban life emerged in the Keeladi region of southern India in the third century BCE: This narrows the sentence to a single region and century, but the 'single fountainhead' line is about the broader question of where Indian civilisation as a whole originated, not just how Keeladi specifically urbanised at one date.
- The Keeladi archaeological dig proved that Indian urban and modern life emerged independently in several historical periods and geographies, and no one theory is enough to explain it: This matches the sentence well. A 'single fountainhead' means one sole point of origin; challenging that idea means suggesting there were multiple, independent origins, in different places and periods, which is exactly what the passage argues by showing that Tamil Nadu developed urban life and a script on its own timeline, separate from the north.
- None of the above: This cannot be right since the third option accurately restates the sentence's meaning.
The phrase 'single fountainhead' is really a metaphor for one exclusive point of origin, and the passage's broader argument, that Keeladi shows an independent, southern trajectory for urban and literate life, directly supports the idea of multiple origins rather than one.
Therefore, the correct answer is the Keeladi archaeological dig proved that Indian urban and modern life emerged independently in several historical periods and geographies, and no one theory is enough to explain it.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3
Language, including a script similar to the Brahmi script, emerged in Keeladi in the sixth century BCE. Which of the following is the most convincing conclusion from this statement?
Language, including a script similar to the Brahmi script, emerged in Keeladi in the sixth century BCE. Which of the following is the most convincing conclusion from this statement?
Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
- Keeladi is a centre of culture and learning far superior to any others in ancient India.
- People of Keeladi were illiterate and could not use language to inscribe on their pots and pans.
- Ancient urban history of India, as we know it today, could significantly be altered by the findings of the advances achieved by the Keeladi civilization.
- All the above
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Approach Solution - 1
The correct option is (C):Ancient urban history of India, as we know it today, could significantly be altered by the findings of the advances achieved by the Keeladi civilization.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The question asks for the most convincing conclusion from the fact that a script similar to Brahmi emerged in Keeladi in the sixth century BCE. Let's test each option for how well it is actually supported by this fact.
- Keeladi is a centre of culture and learning far superior to any others in ancient India: This goes well beyond what the fact supports. Finding an early script shows Keeladi had a literate culture; it does not by itself establish that Keeladi was 'superior' to every other centre in ancient India, a comparison the passage never makes.
- People of Keeladi were illiterate and could not use language to inscribe on their pots and pans: This directly contradicts the fact given, since finding a script and inscriptions on pots is evidence of literacy, not its absence.
- Ancient urban history of India, as we know it today, could significantly be altered by the findings of the advances achieved by the Keeladi civilization: This is the most reasonable, measured conclusion. If a distinct, dated script existed in Keeladi earlier than previously assumed, it means the accepted timeline and geography of literacy and urban development in India may need to be revised, exactly the kind of paradigm shift the rest of the passage describes.
- All the above: This cannot be correct, since the first two options are either unsupported or directly contradicted by the fact given.
Evidence of an early script is significant precisely because it can change what historians accept as the timeline of literacy and urbanisation in India, without needing to claim Keeladi was uniquely superior to every other ancient centre.
Therefore, the correct answer is ancient urban history of India, as we know it today, could significantly be altered by the findings of the advances achieved by the Keeladi civilization.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4
BCE is the acronym for:
BCE is the acronym for:
Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
- Before the Common Era
- Before Colloquial Era
- Before Chapel Eternal
- Behind Christ Era
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Approach Solution - 1
The correct option is (A):Before the Common Era
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
This question asks for the meaning of the acronym BCE, a standard general knowledge term used throughout the passage. Let's check each option.
- Before the Common Era: This is the correct, standard expansion of BCE, the secular equivalent of 'BC,' used to date events before year 1 of the widely used calendar system.
- Before Colloquial Era: This is not a real term; 'colloquial' refers to informal language and has no connection to how BCE is used as a dating convention.
- Before Chapel Eternal: This is not a real term either; it does not correspond to any recognised meaning of the acronym.
- Behind Christ Era: This is also incorrect; while BCE is related in spirit to the older 'BC' (Before Christ) convention, the modern, secular term is not 'Behind Christ Era,' and the phrase is not grammatically or historically accurate.
Only the first option gives the accepted, standard meaning of BCE as it is used by historians and in the passage's own dates.
Therefore, the correct answer is Before the Common Era.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5
“A farmer could write his own name on a pot he owned. The fight going on here is ‘You are not the one to teach me to write, I have learnt it myself.’ ” — These sentences imply:
“A farmer could write his own name on a pot he owned. The fight going on here is ‘You are not the one to teach me to write, I have learnt it myself.’ ” — These sentences imply:
Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
- That the Keeladi civilization was an inegalitarian one.
- That the Keeladi civilization did not conserve the access to education and literacy only for the elite.
- That the farmers of the Keeladi civilization were also potters.
- All the above
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is B
Approach Solution - 1
The correct option is (B):That the Keeladi civilization did not conserve the access to education and literacy only for the elite.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The question asks what is implied by the quote about a farmer writing his own name on a pot and the line 'you are not the one to teach me to write, I have learnt it myself.' Let's test each option against this quote.
- That the Keeladi civilization was an inegalitarian one: 'Inegalitarian' means unequal in the distribution of rights or resources, which is the opposite of what this quote suggests. The quote shows an ordinary farmer, not a ruler or priest, being literate, which points toward wider access rather than restricted, unequal access.
- That the Keeladi civilization did not conserve the access to education and literacy only for the elite: This matches the quote directly. A farmer, someone outside the traditional elite, being able to write his own name on a pot he owned shows that literacy was not confined to a ruling or priestly class, and the defiant line about learning to write 'myself' reinforces that this knowledge was not handed down only by an authority figure.
- That the farmers of the Keeladi civilization were also potters: The quote says the farmer wrote his name 'on a pot he owned,' which only tells us he possessed a pot, not that he made it himself; owning and making pottery are different things, and the passage does not claim farmers doubled as potters.
- All the above: This cannot be correct since the first and third options are not supported by the quote.
The quote's real weight is in showing that literacy reached beyond the elite, down to a farmer, which is precisely what the second option states.
Therefore, the correct answer is that the Keeladi civilization did not conserve the access to education and literacy only for the elite.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top CLAT Questions
- In the realm of contemporary literature, the interplay between character and setting is a nuanced dance that shapes the narrative’s essence. The setting, often described with painstaking detail, becomes more than a backdrop; it becomes a character, influencing the plot and character development.
Consider, for instance, the barren expanse of the desert in Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Namesake. The arid landscape mirrors the sense of isolation felt by the protagonist, Gogol, as he navigates his identity crisis in a foreign land. The relentless sun and vast sands are not mere descriptions; they are the silent witnesses to his inner turmoil.
On the other end of the literary spectrum, there is Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. The lush, vibrant Kerala backwaters are not just the setting; they are a character woven into the fabric of the story. The teeming, humid landscape reflects the complex web of human relationships and secrets that unravel in the narrative. This interplay is not confined to contemporary literature alone. In Shakespeare’s timeless tragedy Macbeth, the eerie and foreboding setting of the Scottish moors casts a dark shadow over the characters’ actions. The moors, shrouded in mist and mystery, serve as an ever-present omen of the impending tragedy. - The crisis of justice that is the subject matter of discussion in the media today is in fact the crisis of “justice for the middle class”. The main difference between India and the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries is that whereas the middle class in these countries has reasonable access to justice, in India it does not. A vocal and powerful middle class has emerged in India since 1991. It is demanding reasonable access to justice. Much of the judicial reform effort will help meet this demand…
The question of justice for the poor is, however, an altogether different challenge. No country in the world has been able to secure justice for the poor. Most of the jails of the richest countries are filled with the poorest. The “masses” are more often victims of the criminal justice system than of crime. In India as well, jails are almost exclusively filled with the poor. The civil justice system is hardly accessible to them. They are often victimised by lawyers, touts and court staff. They are docket-excluded, a new type of untouchability. The language and the logic—and the colonial and feudal culture—of the judicial system are alien to them. It rarely takes cognisance of their needs and interests.
Their main concern, therefore, is to escape the attention of the justice system, criminal and civil. A landless Dalit person in the interior of Madhya Pradesh once gave me an insightful definition of a court from the perspective of the masses: “A court is a place where you are forcibly taken by the police to be punished; no one goes to a court.” In contrast, many lawyers and judges colloquially define a court as “a temple of justice where rights are protected”.
These sharply divergent visions mean that justice for one section is often injustice for another. Protecting the livelihood of traditional taxi and auto drivers from predatory pricing by corporate app-based taxi providers by imaginatively using the available tools of law to delay their incursion would be seen by the rich and by sections of the middle class as a failure of the judicial system, and possibly as also resulting in a downgrading of the “ease of doing business” measure. However, the masses would see such a judicial intervention as strong evidence of a good justice system. Although the conflict over competing visions of the nation and conflicting demands from social and economic segments have confined judicial reform of judicial administration mainly to “neutral” areas such as process reform, procedural law, technology, planning and court and case management, judge strength, and the workload of judges, there has been considerable improvement in these areas, and the judicial system has improved its performance.
[Extracted, with edits, from “Justice and the Two Ideas of India”, by G. Mohan Gopal, Frontline] - Everything she wanted was here, at Carignano, in Kasauli. Here, on the ridge of the mountain, in this quiet house. It was the place, and the time of life, that she had wanted and prepared for all her life-as she realized on the first day at Carignano, with a great, cool flowering of relief - and at last she had it. She wanted no one and nothing else. Whatever else came, or happened here, would be an unwelcome intrusion and distraction. This she tried to convey to the plodding postman with a cold and piercing stare from the height of the ridge onto his honest bull back. Unfortunately, he did not look up at her on the hilltop but stared stolidly down at the dust piling onto his shoes as he plodded on. A bullock-man, an oafish ox, she thought bitterly. She stepped backwards into the garden and the wind suddenly billowed up and threw the pine branches about as though to curtain her. She was grey, tall and thin and her silk sari made a sweeping, shivering sound and she fancied she could merge with the pine trees and be mistaken for one. To be a tree, no more and no less, was all she was prepared to undertake.
What pleased and satisfied her so, here at Carignano, was its barrenness. This was the chief virtue of all Kasauli of course-its starkness. It had rocks, it had pines, it had light and air. In every direction there was a sweeping view - to the north, of the mountains, to the south, of the plains. Occasionally an eagle swam through this clear unobstructed mass of light and air, that was all. And Carignano, her home on the ridge, had no more than that. Why should it? The sun shone on its white walls. Its windows were open the ones facing north opened on to the blue waves of the Himalayas flowing out and up to the line of ice and snow sketched upon the sky, while those that faced south looked down the plunging cliff to the plain stretching out, flat and sere to the blurred horizon.
Yes, there were some apricot trees close to the house. There were clumps of iris that had finished blooming. There was the kitchen with a wing of smoke lifting out of its chimney and a stack of wood outside its door. But these were incidental, almost unimportant.
[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from “Fire on the Mountain” by Anita Desai] - English literature is a vast and diverse field that has left an indelible mark on the world of letters. From the eloquent plays of William Shakespeare to the complex novels of Jane Austen and the profound poetry of William Wordsworth, English literature offers a window into the human experience. One of the luminaries of English literature is William Shakespeare, often hailed as the greatest playwright in the history of English language. His works, including Hamlet, Macbeth, and Romeo and Juliet, are celebrated for their exploration of human nature, love, ambition, and tragedy. His characters, such as the tormented Hamlet and the star-crossed lovers Romeo and Juliet, continue to captivate readers and audiences worldwide.
The 19th century ushered in a new era of literary giants. Jane Austen’s novels, such as Pride and Prejudice and Sense and Sensibility, provide incisive social commentary through the lens of wit and romance. Austen’s heroines, like Elizabeth Bennet and Elinor Dashwood, remain beloved literary figures known for their intelligence and resilience. The Romantic era brought forth poets like William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who celebrated * 8 UG the beauty of nature and the emotional intensity of the individual. Wordsworth’s ‘‘I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud’’ and Coleridge’s ‘‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’’ are testament to the power of the written words to evoke profound emotions and imagery. Moving towards 20th century, English literature continued to evolve. Virginia Woolf’s ground-breaking novel Mrs. Dalloway explored the inner thoughts and lives of its characters with a modernist narrative style. Dystopian visions, as seen in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four provided stark warnings about the dangers of totalitarianism and the erosion of individual freedom.
Today, English literature is a global phenomenon, transcending borders and languages. Indian authors like Arundhati Roy, with her novel The God of Small Things, have won prestigious international literary awards. The book not only explores intricate family dynamics but also delves into the broader socio-political landscape of India. In summary, English literature is a testament to the enduring power of storytelling and the written word. It encompasses an array of authors, themes, and styles that continue to captivate and inspire readers across the world. - On the evening of the 10th, General Dyer arrived at Amritsar, and the Deputy-Commissioner handed over the civil power to him. He issued a proclamation by word of mouth that no meetings should be held. Two days later, after there had been no sort of riot, nor murder, General Dyer heard that a meeting was to be held at the Jallianwala Bagh. He proceeded there with about fifty troops, half British, half Indian, and a certain number of Ghurkas, armed with their kukris. The Jallianwala Bagh is an open space, half a mile square, which has one entry wide enough for three persons. The troops got in and lined up on a mound of debris. The walls, seven feet high, and the surrounding houses enclosed the people. There were, too, three alleys through which the people might have been able to pass. Within thirty seconds of the troops getting in, General Dyer gave orders to fire, and the crowd of people, estimated at anything from 5,000 to 20,000, who were sitting on the ground peacefully listening to the mob oratory, were fired on. The result of the troops’ fire into the mass of people we do not know. But we do know that Dyer’s own estimate of the casualties resulting from ten minutes continual individual firing, was 400 to 500 killed and 1,500 wounded. The people were not able to escape. They were people who had not offered any violence and who had not been warned. These people were shot down. After ten minutes, the ammunition was exhausted and the troops marched off, and they left 1,500 wounded there. There were men lying there for two days, dying of thirst, eating the ground, bleeding to death and nobody to look after them. Those who lived nearby came and carried away some of the wounded from the heap of dead and dying, but the unfortunate country people died there miserably of their wounds. This is what is done in 1919 in British India…
Centuries hence you will find Indian children brought up to this spot, just as they visit now the Cawnpore Well, and you can imagine the feelings of these Indians for generations over this terrible business.
[Col. Wedgwood, MP, speaking in the British Parliament, 22 December 1919]
View More Questions